Towards Professionalism in Higher Education: An Exploratory Case Study of Struggles and Needs of Online Adjunct Professors
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this research was to gain an understanding of the unique professional development needs related to the struggles of online adjunct professors. Twenty-one participants from within a purposefully selected group of online adjunct professors in the United States participated in this qualitative investigation. Data were gathered in two phases: the first phase consisted of a six open-ended-question Qualtrics questionnaire completed by the 21 respondents, and the second phase was follow-up interviews with six of the 21 participants along with the collection of pertinent documents related to professional development. Results indicate that online adjunct professors receive varied and limited professional development, and therefore need more training in the following major categories: course preparation and technology awareness, access to course materials and online resources, and improved communication interaction and engagement. The participating online adjunct professors confirmed that training within these professional development areas would be most beneficial for all stakeholders and should be provided by their employing institution or attained through self-initiated methods.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When there is more investment, the country gets more projects going, which makes the economy grow.
“When there is more investment, the country gets more projects going, which makes the economy grow [38, 39].”
From Dynamics of economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries: a panel ARDL approach (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,224 · see citing works
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,885 · see citing works
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,670 · see citing works
(2017) · Cited by 16,036 · see citing works
Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311413609 · Cited by 1,814 · see citing works
How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching?
Kennedy, M. M. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315626800 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Reframing Professional Development Through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning
Webster-Wright, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308330970 · Cited by 1,174 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Professional development programs differ among educational institutions and discussions have occurred for years regarding the theory and efficacy surrounding professional development (Webster-Wright, 2009).”
Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018) · Cited by 810 · see citing works
“Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers
Torrey Trust, Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Effective Online Instruction in Higher Education
Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012) · Quarterly review of distance education · doi:10.1108/qrde-02-2012-0002 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses
Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Eagan, M. K., Jaeger, A. J., & Grantham, A. E. (2015) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2015.11777371 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in a Turbulent Era
Finkelstein, M. J., Conley, V. M., & Schuster, J. H. (2016) · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Professional Development: Designing Initiatives to Meet the Needs of Online Faculty
Elliott, M., Rhoades, N. K., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015) · The Journal of Educators Online · doi:10.9743/jeo.2015.1.2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Inclusion of Part-Time Faculty for the Benefit of Faculty and Students
Meixner, C., Kruck, S. E., & Madden, L. T. (2010) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2010.484032 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Designing Personalized Online Teaching Professional Development through Self-Assessment
Rhode, J., Richter, S., & Miller, T. E. (2017) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-017-0211-3 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Professional Development in Higher Education
Zuber‐Skerritt, O. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315799872 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Windes, D. L., & Lesht, F. L. (2014) · Online journal of distance learning administration · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Future of Online Education in Crisis: A Call to Action.
Nash, J. A. (2015) · The turkish online journal of educational technology · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Enrollment, Engagement and Satisfaction in the BlendKit Faculty Development Open, Online Course
Moskal, P. D., Thompson, K., & Futch, L. (2015) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v19i4.555 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Faculty Development in the Age of Evidence
Austin, A. E., Beach, A. L., Sorcinelli, M. D., et al. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003444787 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Preparing Faculty to Teach Online: Recommendations for Developing Self-Paced Training
the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center at Northern Illinois University, D., Rhode, J., Krishnamurthi, M., & the Office of the Provost and Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Northern Illinois University, D. (2016) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.717 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Has the shift to overworked and underpaid adjunct faculty helped education outcomes?
Nica, E. (2017) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1300026 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Recruiting, Orienting, & Supporting Online Adjunct Faculty: A Survey of Practices.
Magda, A. J., Poulin, R., & Clinefelter, D. L. (2015) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Characteristics of Adjunct Faculty Teaching Online: Institutional Implications.
Mandernach, J., Register, L., & O'Donnell, C. (2015) · Online journal of distance learning administration · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Online Faculty Perceptions on Effective Faculty Mentoring: A Qualitative Study.
Williams, T., Layne, M., & Ice, P. (2014) · Online journal of distance learning administration · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Professional Development for Online and Mobile Learning: Promoting Teachers’ Pedagogical Inquiry
Baran, E. (2018) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_31 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
I Really Wanted to Attend but It Never Happened: Instructional Development for Adjunct Faculty.
Bolitzer, L. A. (2019) · The journal of faculty development · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Adjuncts and Mission: Maintaining Distinctives in an Era of Part-Time Faculty
Burns, D. J., Smith, Y. S., & Starcher, K. (1969) · Christian Business Academy Review · doi:10.69492/cbar.v10i0.21 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A Study of the Impact of Professional Development in Diversity on Adjunct Faculty
Keehn, S., & Martinez, M. G. (2006) · Action in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/01626620.2006.10463416 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
New Adjunct Faculty Outreach: Making a Connection
Cottom, C., Atwell, A., & Ombres, S. (2018) · Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Barnett, D. E. (2019). Full-range leadership as a predictor of extra effort in online higher education: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(1), 86-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v18/l1/r6 · DOI
- Dailey-Herbert, A., Mandernach, J. B., Donnelli-Sallee, E., & Norris, V. R. (2014). Expectations, motivations, and barriers to professional development: Journal of Faculty Development, 28(1), 67-82.
- Gehrke, S. J., & Kezar, A. (2015). Supporting non-tenure-track faculty at 4-year colleges and universities: A national study of deans' values and decisions. Educational Policy, 29(6), 926-960.
- Gregory, R. & Martindale, T. (2016). Faculty development for online instruction in higher education. In M. Simonson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Association of Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) conference (pp. 213-234). Las Vegas, Nevada.
- Kezar. A., & Maxey, D. (2016). Envisioning the faculty for the 21st century. Rutgers University Press.
- Meyer, K. (2014). An analysis of the research on faculty development for online teaching and identification of new directions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 17(4), 1- 19. https://doi.org/10.24059/o1j.v17i4.320 · DOI
- Nordin, E., & Anthony, P. (2014). Supporting online faculty holistically: Developing a support website resource. Higher Learning Research Communications. 4(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.18870/hr1rc.v4i1.158 · DOI
- Rich, T. (2017). The value of adjuncts: A study of the intrinsic factors impacting field seminar instruction. Field Scholar, 7(1), 1-17.
- Stack, S. (2015). Learning outcomes in an online vs traditional course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsot1.2015.090105 · DOI
- Terosky, A., & Heasley, C. (2015). Supporting online faculty through a sense of community and collegiality. Online Learning 19(3), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.24059/o1j.v1913.673 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dynamics of economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries: a panel ARDL approach
Hidthiir, M. H. B., Ahmad, Z., Junoh, M. Z. M., & Yusof, M. F. B. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00351-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Butters, D., & Gann, C.
- Affiliations
- Amridge University (US)
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2022-09-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W4295776135
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Online Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- adjunct faculty, professional development, professionalism, higher education, online learning, course preparation, technology awareness, course materials access, student engagement, faculty training needs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
