Cited by 23Online and Blended LearningEvaluation of Teaching PracticesEducational Technology and E-Learning

Preparing Faculty to Teach Online: Recommendations for Developing Self-Paced Training

Open access
the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center at Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115 USA, Rhode, Jason, Krishnamurthi, Murali, the Office of the Provost and Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115 USA·2016·International Journal of Information and Education Technology

Abstract

As the popularity of online education increases and institutions seek to grow their online offerings to meet student demand, more faculty need to be trained to teach online.Campus offices such as Faculty Development centers are often tasked with training faculty for teaching online, many of whom my be adjuncts who cannot attend in-person training or commit to a specific timeframe for participation.In this paper, a flexible and customizable self-paced training model for preparing faculty to teach online is described and suggestions shared for institutions seeking to offer self-paced online professional development training opportunities for faculty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.717

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-paced online courses provide the flexibility to match faculty members' variable schedules and provide instruction accommodating a range of teaching styles and levels of technology expertise.

    “Self-paced online courses provide the flexibility to match faculty members' variable schedules and provide the instruction accommodating a range of teaching styles and levels of technology expertise (Rhode & Krishnamurthi, 2016).”

    From Students' Perceptions of Quality Across Four Course Development Models (2018) · cites this paper as Rhode & Krishnamurthi, 2016

  • Once developed, the implementation of faculty development for online courses is frequently scalable.

    “However, once developed, the implementation is frequently scalable (Rhode & Krishnamurthi, 2016).”

    From Students' Perceptions of Quality Across Four Course Development Models (2018) · cites this paper as Rhode & Krishnamurthi, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
the Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center at Northern Illinois University, D., Rhode, J., Krishnamurthi, M., & the Office of the Provost and Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Northern Illinois University, D.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
Rhode, Jason
Venue
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
Published
2016
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
376-382
ISSN
2010-3689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055461253
Cited by
23
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Information and Education Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Northern Illinois University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
online learning, faculty development, self-paced training, online professional development, adjunct faculty, faculty training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review