Cited by 15Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

Vocabulary Learning Strategies in ESP Context: Knowledge and Implication

Open access
M. Al Zahrani, Sahar, Chaudhary, Anjum·2022·Arab World English Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The present study aims to explore the knowledge level and preferences regarding vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) among the EFL university students studying English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses. It also investigates the impact of vocabulary learning strategies on EFL learners’ performance. A sample of twenty students from an intact class participated in the study. For data collection, a triangulated approach has been employed through the usage of a questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, together with classroom observations. Moreover, the cumulative percentage of scores in the pre-tests and post-tests has been incorporated to investigate the impact of vocabulary learning strategies. SPSS software is used to calculate the T-test value. The findings demonstrate that the implementation of various vocabulary learning strategies has a substantial impact on the performance of the English language learners within the context of an English for Specific Purposes classroom. The findings have pedagogical implications in the teaching and learning of vocabulary within the ESP context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24093/awej/vol13no1.25

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. v12n5p55 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (1997). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. London: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Folse, K. (2004). Myths about teaching and learning second language vocabulary: what research says. TESL Reporter 37(2), 1-13.
  4. Noor, M.N & Amir, Z. (2009). Exploring the Vocabulary Learning Strategies of EFL learners. Language and Culture: Creating and Fostering Global Communities. 7th International Conference by the School of Studies and Linguistics Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities. pp 313-327, available at http://ukm.my/solls09/Proceeding/PDF/noorizah%20and%20zaini.pdf
  5. Taheri, A.A. & Davoudi, M. (2016). The Effect of the Keyword Method on Vocabulary Learning and Long-Term Retention, International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(1), 114-125, available at www.ijllnet.com

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
M. Al Zahrani, S., & Chaudhary, A.
Affiliations
Umm al-Qura University (SA)
Venue
Arab World English Journal
Published
2022-03-24
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
382-393
ISSN
2229-9327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221104979
Cited by
15
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arab World English Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Umm Al-Qura University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
vocabulary learning strategies, English for specific purposes, EFL learners, learner preferences, vocabulary acquisition, learner performance, vocabulary teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review