Cited by 16COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Support for health care workers and psychological distress: thinking about now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: This study explores the relationship between emotional support, perceived risk and mental health outcomes among health care workers, who faced high rates of burnout and mental distress since the beginning of the COVID­19 pandemic. Methods: A cross­sectional, multicentred online survey of health care workers in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada, during the first wave of the COVID­19 pandemic evaluated coping strategies, confidence in infection control, impact of previous work during the 2003 SARS outbreak and emotional support. Mental health outcomes were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, the Impact of Event Scale – Revised and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ­9). Results: Of 3852 participants, 8.2% sought professional mental health services while 77.3% received emotional support from family, 74.0% from friends and 70.3% from colleagues. Those who felt unsupported in their work had higher odds ratios of experiencing moderate and severe symptoms of anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84–2.69), PTSD (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.58–2.25) and depression (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.57–2.25). Nearly 40% were afraid of telling family about the risks they were exposed to at work. Those who were able to share this information demonstrated lower risk of anxiety (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48–0.69), PTSD (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.41–0.56) and depression (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.47–0.65). Conclusion: Informal sources of support, including family, friends and colleagues, play an important role in mitigating distress and should be encouraged and utilized more by health care workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24095/hpcdp.42.10.01

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Styra, R., Hawryluck, L., McGeer, A., Dimas, M., Lam, E., Giacobbe, P., Lorello, G., Dattani, N., Sheen, J., Rac, V. E., Francis, T., Wu, P. E., Luk, W.-S., Nadarajah, J., & Gold, W. L.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • William Osler Health System (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Markham Stouffville Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Styra, Rima
Venue
Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada
Published
2022-10
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
421-430
ISSN
2368-738X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283730334
Cited by
16
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
healthcare workers, psychological distress, emotional support, informal support, COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, burnout, coping strategies, SARS epidemic, mental health service utilization
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Health Personnel, Humans, Ontario, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review