Support for health care workers and psychological distress: thinking about now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: This study explores the relationship between emotional support, perceived risk and mental health outcomes among health care workers, who faced high rates of burnout and mental distress since the beginning of the COVID19 pandemic. Methods: A crosssectional, multicentred online survey of health care workers in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada, during the first wave of the COVID19 pandemic evaluated coping strategies, confidence in infection control, impact of previous work during the 2003 SARS outbreak and emotional support. Mental health outcomes were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, the Impact of Event Scale – Revised and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9). Results: Of 3852 participants, 8.2% sought professional mental health services while 77.3% received emotional support from family, 74.0% from friends and 70.3% from colleagues. Those who felt unsupported in their work had higher odds ratios of experiencing moderate and severe symptoms of anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84–2.69), PTSD (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.58–2.25) and depression (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.57–2.25). Nearly 40% were afraid of telling family about the risks they were exposed to at work. Those who were able to share this information demonstrated lower risk of anxiety (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.48–0.69), PTSD (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.41–0.56) and depression (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.47–0.65). Conclusion: Informal sources of support, including family, friends and colleagues, play an important role in mitigating distress and should be encouraged and utilized more by health care workers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social distancing measures hindered healthcare workers' access to emotional support from family, friends, and colleagues.
“Additionally, social distancing measures have hindered healthcare workers’ access to emotional support from family, friends, and colleagues [3,4].”
From Mental Health in Healthcare Workers Post-COVID-19: A Latin American Review and Insights into Personalized Management Strategies (2024) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
Physical and mental health impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: A scoping review
Shaukat, N., Ali, D. M., & Razzak, J. (2020) · International Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12245-020-00299-5 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Carmassi, C., Foghi, C., Dell'Oste, V., Cordone, A., Bertelloni, C. A., Bui, E., & Dell'Osso, L. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113312 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Cabarkapa, S., Nadjidai, S. E., Murgier, J., & Ng, C. H. (2020) · Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100144 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Impact on health care workers employed in high-risk areas during the Toronto SARS outbreak
Styra, R., Hawryluck, L., Robinson, S., Kasapinovic, S., Fones, C., & Gold, W. L. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.07.015 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Self-citationHendrickson, R. C., Slevin, R. A., Hoerster, K. D., Chang, B. P., Sano, E., McCall, C. A., Monty, G. R., Thomas, R. G., & Raskind, M. A. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07252-z · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muñoz-Ortega, S., Santamaría-Guayaquil, D., Pluas-Borja, J., Alvarado-Villa, G., Sandoval, V., Alvarado, R., Cherrez-Ojeda, I., & Faytong-Haro, M. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14070680 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Additionally, social distancing measures have hindered healthcare workers’ access to emotional support from family, friends, and colleagues [3,4].”
Background
- Authors
- Styra, R., Hawryluck, L., McGeer, A., Dimas, M., Lam, E., Giacobbe, P., Lorello, G., Dattani, N., Sheen, J., Rac, V. E., Francis, T., Wu, P. E., Luk, W.-S., Nadarajah, J., & Gold, W. L.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- William Osler Health System (CA)
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Markham Stouffville Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Styra, Rima
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada
- Publisher
- Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch (HPCDP) Public Health Agency of Canada
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 421-430
- ISSN
- 2368-738X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9584174
- OpenAlex
- W4283730334
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Toronto
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- healthcare workers, psychological distress, emotional support, informal support, COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, burnout, coping strategies, SARS epidemic, mental health service utilization
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Distress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Health Personnel, Humans, Ontario, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review