CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Online Learning Methods and InnovationsCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceEducation during COVID-19 pandemic

CREATIVITY IN SYNCHRONOUS AND ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A CASE STUDY

Open access
Muzaini, Muhammad, Rahayuningsih, Sri, Nasrun, Nasrun, Hasbi, Muhammad·2021·AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
DOI 10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3897
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

AbstractThe corona virus outbreak has forced all universities to conduct learning online using the internet. We have considered to develop students’ creativity through online learning. We therefore applied synchronous learning and asynchronous learning methods in the classroom and observed how these methods influenced students’ creativity. Purposive sampling technique was used to select one out of 40 students from the Department of Mathematics Education at STKIP YPUP to participate in this study. The subject was chosen because he had fulfilled the criteria of creativity. Data analysis was performed in several stages as follows: 1) analyzing the interview data and the learning videos; 2) performing data reduction by making abstractions; 3) organizing the data in units that were then categorized by coding; 4) checking the data validity by doing time triangulation; 5) analyzing interesting phenomena that are associated with the participant’s creativity. The results of the analysis showed that the subject’s creativity was demonstrated through cognitive flexibility and cognitive fluency, indicated by repeated or cyclic cognitive processes before the participant discovered the solution to the problem. It can be concluded that both synchronous and asynchronous learning methods can support the development of college students’ creativity during the covid-19 pandemic. Keywords: Covid-19 pandemic; creativity; synchronous and asynchronous learning. AbstrakWabah virus corona memaksa semua perguruan tinggi untuk melakukan pembelajaran secara online menggunakan internet. Kami telah mempertimbangkan untuk mengembangkan kreativitas siswa melalui pembelajaran online. Oleh karena itu, kami menerapkan pembelajaran synchronous dan metode pembelajaran asynchronous di kelas dan mengamati bagaimana metode ini mempengaruhi kreativitas siswa. Teknik purposive sampling digunakan untuk memilih satu dari 40 mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika STKIP YPUP untuk berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Subjek dipilih karena telah memenuhi kriteria kreativitas. Analisis data dilakukan dalam beberapa tahapan sebagai berikut: 1) menganalisis data wawancara dan video pembelajaran; 2) melakukan reduksi data dengan membuat abstraksi; 3) mengorganisasikan data dalam satuan-satuan yang kemudian dikategorikan dengan pengkodean; 4) pengecekan keabsahan data dengan melakukan triangulasi waktu; 5) menganalisis fenomena menarik yang terkait dengan kreativitas peserta. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kreativitas subjek ditunjukkan melalui keluwesan kognitif dan kelancaran kognitif, yang ditunjukkan dengan proses kognitif berulang atau siklik sebelum partisipan menemukan solusi dari masalah. Disimpulkan bahwa metode pembelajaran synchronous dan asynchronous dapat mendukung pengembangan kreativitas mahasiswa selama masa pandemi covid-19. Kata Kunci: Pandemi Covid-19, Kreativitas, Pembelajaran Synchronous dan Asynchronous

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3897

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1- 13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820. 2020.1813180 · DOI
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2009.01029.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aldig, E., & Arseven, A. (2017). The Contribution of Learning Outcomes for Listening to Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p4 · DOI
  4. Ayllon, M., Gomez, I., Ballesta-Claver, & Julio. (2016). Mathematical thinking and creativity through mathematical problem posing and solving. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4(1), 169-218. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126306
  5. Barnett, L. A. (2012). Playful People: Fun is in the Mind of the Beholder. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 31(3), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.31.3.c · DOI
  6. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 10-15.
  7. Bliss, T., Robinson, T. J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). An OER COUP: College Teacher and Student Perceptions of Open Educational Resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04 · DOI
  8. Corfman, T., & Beck, D. (2019). Case study of creativity in asynchronous online discussions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239- 019-0150-5 · DOI
  9. Coy, K., Marino, M. T., & Serianni, B. (2014). Using Universal Design for Learning in Synchronous Online Instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434 1402900105 · DOI
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Creswell, John W (pp. 1-459).
  11. De Bono, E. (2015). Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity. In Penguin Books (Vol. 3). Penguin Group.
  12. Fields, Z., & Bisschoff, C. A. (2013). A Theoretical Model to Measure Creativity at a University. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923. 2013.11893117 · DOI
  13. Guo, W., & Wei, J. (2019). Correction to: Teacher Feedback and Students' Self-regulated Learning in Mathematics: A Study of Chinese Secondary Students (The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, (2019), 28, 3, (265- 275), 10.1007/s40299-019-00434- 8). Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299- 019-00436-6 · DOI
  14. Hargrove, R & Nietfeld, J. (2019). The Impact of Metacognitive Instruction on Creative Problem Solving. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1-48.
  15. Hjalmarson, M. A. (2017). Learning to teach mathematics specialists in a synchronous online course: a self- study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(3), 281- 301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857- 015-9323-x · DOI
  16. Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, T.-W., Zhang, X., Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561- 020-00125-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jaarsveld, S., Fink, A., Rinner, M., Schwab, D., Benedek, M., & Lachmann, T. (2015). Intelligence in creative processes: An EEG study. Intelligence, 49, 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.201 5.01.012 · DOI
  18. Karaca, N. H., Uzun, H., & Metin, Ş. (2020). The relationship between the motor creativity and peer play behaviors of preschool children and the factors affecting this relationship. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(August), 100716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020. 100716 · DOI
  19. Li, J., Yang, Z., Qiu, H., Wang, Y., Jian, L., Ji, J., & Li, K. (2020). Anxiety and depression among general population in China at the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 249- 250. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20758 · DOI
  20. Memish, Z. A., Perlman, S., Van Kerkhove, M. D., & Zumla, A. (2020). Middle East respiratory syndrome. The Lancet, 395(10229), 1063-1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(19)33221-0 · DOI
  21. Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online ISSN 2089-8703 (Print) Volume 10, No. 3, 2021, 1722-1735 ISSN 2442-5419 (Online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3897 1734| courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919. 2012.667957 · DOI
  22. Parsons, S., Guldberg, K., Porayska- Pomsta, K., & Lee, R. (2015). Digital stories as a method for evidence-based practice and knowledge co-creation in technology-enhanced learning for children with autism. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(3), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X .2015.1019852 · DOI
  23. Puspitasari, L., In'am, A., & Syaifuddin, M. (2018). Analysis of Students' Creative Thinking in Solving Arithmetic Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/39 · DOI
  24. Rahayuningsih, S., Nusantara, T., As, A., & Susanto, H. (2019). Cognitive Styles: Characterization of College Students' Creative Mathematical Thinking. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 6(3), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349- 0381.0603007 · DOI
  25. Rogers, K. S., Thomas, C., & Holmes, H. (2021). Encouraging student participation in mathematical activities in synchronous online tuition. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e- Learning, 00(00), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513. 2021.1938523 · DOI
  26. Rosso, B. D. (2014). Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies, 35(4), 551- 585. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406 13517600 · DOI
  27. Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P. M., Slot, E. M., Bakker, A., Keijzer, R., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2019). Promoting pupils' creative thinking in primary school mathematics: A case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31(October 2018), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019. 02.003 · DOI
  28. Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2015). Is problem posing a tool for identifying and developing mathematical creativity? Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice, December 2014, 141- 174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 1-4614-6258-3_7 · DOI
  29. Sirajuddin, S., Sa'dijah, C., Parta, N. I., & Sukorıyanto. (2020). Multi- representation raised by prospective teachers in expressing algebra. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 857-870. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.688 710 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muzaini, M., Rahayuningsih, S., Nasrun, N., & Hasbi, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo (ID)
  • Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Yayasan Pendidikan Ujung Pandang (ID)
  • Muhammadiyah University of Makassar (ID)
ORCID
Venue
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher
Muhammadiyah Metro University
Published
2021-10-02
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
1722-1735
ISSN
  • 2089-8703 (ISSN-L)
  • 2442-5419
DOI
10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3897
OpenAlex
W3208068686
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • AKSIOMA Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online Learning Methods and Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Keywords
creativity, synchronous learning, asynchronous learning, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, cognitive flexibility, processing fluency, mathematics education students, university students, problem solving, educational videos, higher education teaching methods, student creativity development, student motivation, student self-regulation, student self-confidence, student self-discipline, student self-efficacy, student self-acceptance, student self-compassion, student self-care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review