Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Crime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceTorture, Ethics, and LawPolicing Practices and Perceptions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 37 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Tortura policial: más allá de “confesiones” para el sistema de justicia penal

Open access
Silva Forné, Carlos, Padilla Oñate, Sergio·2022·Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México

Abstract

En este trabajo se discute la sobrerrepresentación de jugadores afrodescendientes en el futbol profesional ecuatoriano, tanto a nivel de equipos, como en selecciones nacionales. El concepto de “biotipo”, la industria del futbol, un cambio en la institucionalidad deportiva del país y los éxitos internacionales llevaron a la modificación favorable para su práctica en miras a la profesionalización y a la movilidad social. La inclusión mayoritaria de jugadores de El Valle del Chota en las seleccio-nes nacionales y las pocas salidas laborales ayudaron a crear escenarios favorables e incentivos para la práctica del futbol entre los chicos de la zona a pesar de las dificultades de su realización.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

Using ENPOL 2016, the paper tests whether police torture in Mexico is driven not only by obtaining confessions/information but also by rent extraction and moral punishment. Logit models find independent effects for information pressure, economic benefit-seeking, and resistance/affront to authority, with variation across police types.

Key findings

  • The torture variable is present in 40% of the ENPOL 2016 sample: respondents reported at least one of five severe aggressions (crushing with objects, asphyxiation, burns, electric shocks, sexual violations); the text reports N=49,982 cases (Cuadro 2 reports N=49,984).
  • Probability of torture increases 33% when police pressured the detainee for information, 18% when police attempted to appropriate or directly requested money/goods, and 7% when the detainee resisted and/or tried to flee, interpreted as an affront to authority.
  • State and ministerial police show an 11% higher probability of torture than municipal police; federal police show 6% higher. Interactions show the information effect is significant for state, federal, and ministerial police vs. municipal; the rent effect is significant for ministerial vs. municipal; resistance effects are significant for federal and ministerial vs. municipal.
  • Among controls, men have a 15% higher probability; each additional year of age at detention lowers the probability by 0.5%; kidnapping raises it by 30%, extortion and illegal weapons possession by 22%, and homicide/vehicle, business, or home robbery up to 8%.

Methods

  • Uses the 2016 National Survey of Population Deprived of Liberty (ENPOL), with N=49,982 cases, focusing on a reclusive population with high probability of having experienced torture.
  • Dependent variable: dichotomous torture = one or more of five severe physical aggressions after detention and before presentation to the Ministerio Público: crushing, asphyxiation, burns, electric shocks, and sexual violations.
  • Independent variables: pressured for information (42%), attempted appropriation/request of money or goods (25%), and resistance/flight (18%); controls include crime type, police type, sex, age at detention, and sentenced status. Main analysis is logistic regression, first general and then with interactions between police type and the main independent variables.

Limitations

  • The paper states possible bias toward interviewees’ viewpoint; the reclusive population does not cover all police-population exchanges where illegal violence, including torture, may occur; and exact temporal dynamics are unknown, so attributing rent or information as the motive that activates torture is imprecise.
  • The paper states that ENPOL captures people who ended in reclusion, not detainees who avoided the justice system by giving some benefit to authority, and that torture’s hidden nature makes measurement difficult.
  • Evident from the text: the data are cross-sectional and self-reported, so the models are observational and cannot establish causality; the torture measure is restricted to five severe acts and excludes blows, kicks, or weapon injuries that may have occurred during detention dynamics.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24201/es.2022v40n119.2121

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 Valid · 7 Not valid · 27 Not checked · 72 Own results and interpretations

66 more claims

Create a free account to see all 107 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 21
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 23

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Birkbeck, Christopher, & Gabaldón, Luis G. (2002). La disposición de agentes policiales a usar la fuerza contra el ciudadano. En Briceño-León, Roberto (ed.), Violencia, sociedad y justicia en América Latina (pp. 209-243). Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO.
  2. Black, Donald (1976). The behavior of law. Nueva York: Academic Press.
  3. Chevigny, Paul (1993). Urban police violence in Brazil: Torture and Police Killings in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro after Five Years. News from Americas Watch, 5(5), 1-30.
  4. Gabaldón, Luis G., & Birbeck, Christopher (1998). Criterios situacionales de funcionarios policiales sobre el uso de la fuerza física. Capítulo Criminológico, 26(2), 99-132.
  5. Kutnjak, Sanja (2005). Fallen Blue Knigths: Controlling Police Corruption. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Muir Jr., William K. (1977). Police: Street corner Politicians. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  7. Van Maanen, John (1978). The Asshole. En J. Van Maanen, & P. Manning (eds.), Policing: A view from the streets (pp. 302-328). Santa Mónica: Goodyear Publishing Co.
  8. 10.2307/3088942 · DOI

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Silva Forné, C., & Padilla Oñate, S.
Venue
Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México
Published
2022-05-11
Volume
40
Issue
119
Pages
487-526
ISSN
  • 0185-4186 (ISSN-L)
  • 2448-6442
OpenAlex
W4281563378
Cited by
6
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
police torture, police brutality, criminal justice system, confession, punishment, informal policing, Mexico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.