Cited by 387Facilities and Workplace ManagementUrban Green Space and HealthIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Interior Plants May Improve Worker Productivity and Reduce Stress in a Windowless Environment

Open access
Lohr, Virginia I., Pearson-Mims, Caroline H., Goodwin, Georgia K.·1996·Journal of Environmental Horticulture

Abstract

This study documents some of the benefits of adding plants to a windowless work place—a college computer lab. Participants' blood pressure and emotions were monitored while completing a simple, timed computer task in the presence or absence of plants. When plants were added to this interior space, the participants were more productive (12% quicker reaction time on the computer task) and less stressed (systolic blood pressure readings lowered by one to four units). Immediately after completing the task, participants in the room with plants present reported feeling more attentive (an increase of 0.5 on a self-reported scale from one to five) than people in the room with no plants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24266/0738-2898-14.2.97

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. I. Conklin, E. 1974. Interior plantings bring nature indoors. Amer. Nurseryman 139(2):12-13, 105-112.
  2. Evans. M.R. and H. Malone. 1992. People and plants: A case study in the hotel industry. p. 220-222 In: D. Relf (Ed.). The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development: A National Symposium. Timber Press, Portland. OR.
  3. In: D. Relf (Ed.). The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development: A National Symposium. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  4. Marchant, B. 1982. A look at the industry-dimensions and prospects. Amer. Nurseryman 156(10): 30-49.
  5. II. Scrivens. S. 1980. Interior Planting in Large Buildings. The Architectural Press. London.
  6. Welford, A.T. (Ed.). 1980. Reaction Times. Academic Press, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lohr, V. I., Pearson-Mims, C. H., & Goodwin, G. K.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Horticulture
Published
1996-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
97-100
ISSN
  • 0738-2898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2573-5586
OpenAlex
W2737299620
Cited by
387
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Environmental Horticulture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
interior plants, indoor plants, labor productivity, stress reduction, blood pressure, attention, reaction time, emotions, office interior design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review