Parasites in Kentucky Thoroughbreds at necropsy: Emphasis on stomach worms and tapeworms
Abstract
SUMMARY: A total of 363 Thoroughbreds (62 males, 292 females, and 9 geldings), 1 to 26 years of age, were examined at necropsy for internal parasites for about a 12-month period from February 1981 through February 1982. Emphasis was on examining the stomach for nematodes and the small intestine and cecum for tapeworms. Parasites recovered from the stomach and infection rates were: Habronema spp—immature (24%), H muscae—adult (38%), Draschia megastoma—immature (13%), D megastoma—adult (62%), and Trichostrongylus axei—adult (4%); lesions caused by D megastoma were found upon gross observation in 58% of the stomachs. The tapeworm, Anoplocephala perfoliata, was recovered from 54% of the horses; A magna was not found. There was no obvious difference in infection rates of the stomach worms and tapeworms according to age or sex of the horses. Seasonal differences were apparent only for immature Habronema spp and immature D megastoma for which infection rates began increasing in June, peaking in October, and declining thereafter. Presence of 4 additional species of parasites was recorded, but only a cursory examination was made for them. These were the large strongyles, Strongylus vulgaris, S edentatus, and S equinus, from the cecum and a filariid, Setaria spp (probably S equina), from the abdominal cavity, for which recovery rates from the horses were 8%, 8%, 1%, and 7%, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In North America, prevalence ranges from 11 to 62%.
“In North America the prevalence ranges from 11 to 62% (19)”
From Habronematidosis in Equids: Current Status, Advances, Future Challenges (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Draschia megastoma is a frequent species in the USA where the percentage of positive animals ranges from 24 to 62%.
“It is a frequent species in the USA where the percentage of positive animals ranges from 24 to 62% (19, 28, 38)”
From Habronematidosis in Equids: Current Status, Advances, Future Challenges (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The prevalence and abundance of internal parasites in working horses autopsied in Poland
Gawor, J. J. (1995) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/0304-4017(94)00698-c · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Prevalence, intensity and seasonality of gastrointestinal parasites in abattoir horses in Germany
Rehbein, S., Visser, M., & Winter, R. (2013) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-012-3150-0 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
TRAVERSA, D., GIANGASPERO, A., IORIO, R., OTRANTO, D., PAOLETTI, B., & GASSER, R. B. (2004) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182004006122 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Prevalence and intensity of non-strongyle intestinal parasites of horses in northern Queensland
MFITILODZE, M., & HUTCHINSON, G. (1989) · Australian Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1989.tb09708.x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Traversa, D., Giangaspero, A., Galli, P., Paoletti, B., Otranto, D., & Gasser, R. B. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Probes · doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2004.01.006 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Habronematidosis in Equids: Current Status, Advances, Future Challenges
Barlaam, A., Traversa, D., Papini, R., & Giangaspero, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00358 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Molecular cross-sectional survey of gastric habronemosis in horses
Traversa, D., Iorio, R., Capelli, G., Paoletti, B., Bartolini, R., Otranto, D., & Giangaspero, A. (2006) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.021 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Epidemiological observations on stomach worms of donkeys in Morocco
Pandey, V. S., Ouhelli, H., & Verhulst, A. (1992) · Veterinary Research Communications · doi:10.1007/bf01839326 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Schuster, R. K., & Sivakumar, S. (2013) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.06.015 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lyons, E. T., Tolliver, S. C., Drudge, J. H., Swerczek, T. W., & Crowe, M. W.
- Affiliations
- From the Department of Veterinary Science, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-00761.
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Veterinary Research
- Published
- 1983-05-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 839-844
- ISSN
- 0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4407210207
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
- Keywords
- stomach nematodes, cestodes, Habronema muscae, Trichostrongylus axei, Anoplocephala perfoliata, Strongylus, Setaria equina, seasonal variation in infection, infection rate, autopsy findings
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cestoda, Cestode Infections, Digestive System, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Horse Diseases, Horses, Kentucky, Male, Nematoda, Nematode Infections, Seasons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review