Cited by 72Helminth infection and controlVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchParasite Biology and Host Interactions

Parasites in Kentucky Thoroughbreds at necropsy: Emphasis on stomach worms and tapeworms

Lyons, E. T., Tolliver, S. C., Drudge, J. H., Swerczek, T. W., Crowe, M. W.·1983·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

SUMMARY: A total of 363 Thoroughbreds (62 males, 292 females, and 9 geldings), 1 to 26 years of age, were examined at necropsy for internal parasites for about a 12-month period from February 1981 through February 1982. Emphasis was on examining the stomach for nematodes and the small intestine and cecum for tapeworms. Parasites recovered from the stomach and infection rates were: Habronema spp—immature (24%), H muscae—adult (38%), Draschia megastoma—immature (13%), D megastoma—adult (62%), and Trichostrongylus axei—adult (4%); lesions caused by D megastoma were found upon gross observation in 58% of the stomachs. The tapeworm, Anoplocephala perfoliata, was recovered from 54% of the horses; A magna was not found. There was no obvious difference in infection rates of the stomach worms and tapeworms according to age or sex of the horses. Seasonal differences were apparent only for immature Habronema spp and immature D megastoma for which infection rates began increasing in June, peaking in October, and declining thereafter. Presence of 4 additional species of parasites was recorded, but only a cursory examination was made for them. These were the large strongyles, Strongylus vulgaris, S edentatus, and S equinus, from the cecum and a filariid, Setaria spp (probably S equina), from the abdominal cavity, for which recovery rates from the horses were 8%, 8%, 1%, and 7%, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.1983.44.05.839

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyons, E. T., Tolliver, S. C., Drudge, J. H., Swerczek, T. W., & Crowe, M. W.
Affiliations
  • From the Department of Veterinary Science, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-00761.
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
1983-05-01
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
839-844
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407210207
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Keywords
stomach nematodes, cestodes, Habronema muscae, Trichostrongylus axei, Anoplocephala perfoliata, Strongylus, Setaria equina, seasonal variation in infection, infection rate, autopsy findings
MeSH terms
Animals, Cestoda, Cestode Infections, Digestive System, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Horse Diseases, Horses, Kentucky, Male, Nematoda, Nematode Infections, Seasons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review