Cited by 91Helminth infection and controlVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchParasite Biology and Host Interactions

Prevalence, intensity and seasonality of gastrointestinal parasites in abattoir horses in Germany

Rehbein, Steffen, Visser, Martin, Winter, Renate·2013·Parasitology Research

Abstract

Prevalence and intensity of gastrointestinal parasites were studied through a longitudinal survey in 400 horses over a 17-month period in an abattoir in Germany. Three hundred and ten horses (77.5 %) were demonstrated harbouring endoparasites either by direct recovery of parasites from the digestive tract and/or in terms of faecal egg counts (strongyles). The following parasites were found (percentage prevalence, range of counts): Gasterophilus intestinalis larvae (2.25 %, 1-154), Gasterophilus nasalis larvae (0.25 %, 44), Trichostrongylus axei (11.0 %, 1-3,620), Habronema majus (8.0 %; 1-422), Habronema muscae (26.5 %, 1-3,563), Habronema spp. fourth-stage larvae (5.5 %; 1-1,365), Parascaris equorum (total prevalence 11.3 %; adults 8.8 %, 1-178; fourth-stage larvae 2.5 %, 5-2,320), Anoplocephala perfoliata (28.5 %, 1-2,013) and Paranoplocephala mamillana (1.0 %, 1-11). Strongyle eggs (≥10 eggs per gram of faeces) were recorded in 60.8 % of the horses (10-6,450 eggs per gram of faeces).Prevalences of infection with T. axei, P. equorum and strongyles did not show a correlation to specific seasons. In contrast, a significant variation among seasons of collection was shown for the infection rates of Habronema spp. (p < 0.05) and A. perfoliata (p < 0.001). Seasonal prevalence of Habronema spp. infection was significantly (p < 0.01) higher in summer (39.0 %), autumn (34.8 %) and winter (36.5 %) than in spring (18.7 %), and A. perfoliata were significantly (p < 0.001) more often recorded during autumn (36.1 %) and winter (36.5 %) than in spring (17.3 %) and summer (15.9 %). Prevalences of T. axei, Habronema spp., strongyles and A. perfoliata in male and female horses were almost alike, but ascarids were significantly (p = 0.025) more often recorded in male than in female horses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-012-3150-0

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rehbein, S., Visser, M., & Winter, R.
Corresponding author
Rehbein, Steffen
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2012-10-11
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
407-413
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W1968037298
Cited by
91
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Keywords
gastrointestinal parasites, horses, prevalence, infection intensity, seasonal variation, strongyles, Gasterophilus intestinalis, Gasterophilus nasalis, Trichostrongylus axei, Habronema, Parascaris equorum, Anoplocephala perfoliata, fecal egg count, equine parasitology
MeSH terms
Abattoirs, Animals, Feces, Female, Germany, Helminthiasis, Helminthiasis, Animal, Helminths, Horse Diseases, Horses, Intestinal Diseases, Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic, Male, Parasite Egg Count, Seasons, Sex Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review