The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1986 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of fetal bovine serum: ethical or scientific problem?
Jochems, C. E. A., van der Valk, J. B. F., Stafleu, F. R., & Baumans, V. (2002) · Alternatives to Laboratory Animals · doi:10.1177/026119290203000208 · Cited by 354
Comparative analysis of ACTH and corticosterone sampling methods in rats
Vahl, T. P., Ulrich-Lai, Y. M., Ostrander, M. M., Dolgas, C. M., Elfers, E. E., Seeley, R. J., D'Alessio, D. A., & Herman, J. P. (2005) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00122.2005 · Cited by 304
The Caring-Killing Paradox: Euthanasia-Related Strain Among Animal-Shelter Workers1
Reeve, C. L., Rogelberg, S. G., Spitzmuller, C., & Digiacomo, N. (2005) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02096.x · Cited by 146
(2002) · PubMed · Cited by 46
Investigation into host selection of the cecal acetogen population in rabbits after weaning.
Yang, C., Mi, L., Hu, X., Liu, J., & Wang, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158768 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Published
- 1986-02-01
- Volume
- 188
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 252-268
- ISSN
- 0003-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W161558421
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 1986 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2460/javma.1986.188.03.252
- The paper
- 1986 Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia. (1986). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1986.188.03.252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
