Cited by 32Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Induced Mood and Selective Attention

Brand, N., Verspui, L., Oving, A.·1997·Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract

Subjects ( N = 60) were randomly assigned to an elated, depressed, or neutral mood-induction condition to assess the effect of mood state on cognitive functioning. In the elated condition film fragments expressing happiness and euphoria were shown. In the depressed condition some frightening and distressing film fragments were presented. The neutral group watched no film. Mood states were measured using the Profile of Mood States, and a Stroop task assessed selective attention. Both were presented by computer. The induction groups differed significantly in the expected direction on the mood subscales Anger, Tension, Depression, Vigour, and Fatigue, and also in the mean scale response times, i.e., slower responses for the depressed condition and faster for the elated one. Differences between conditions were found in the errors on the Stroop: in the depressed condition were the fewest errors and significantly longer error reaction times. Speed of error was associated with self-reported fatigue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pms.1997.84.2.455

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mood induction in healthy adults can influence selective attention abilities on a nonemotional Stroop task.

    “Brand et al.70 showed that mood induction (e.g., euphoric or distressing film fragments) in healthy adults could influence selective attention abilities on a nonemotional Stroop task, in accordance with the findings reviewed above of diminished selective attention performance in MDD patients.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [70]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brand, N., Verspui, L., & Oving, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Brand, N.
Venue
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
1997-04
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
455-463
ISSN
  • 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-688X
OpenAlex
W2023996913
Cited by
32
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perceptual and Motor Skills (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
mood induction, selective attention, Stroop task, depression, elation, cognitive function, reaction time, fatigue, anger, tension, vigor, Profile of Mood States
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attention, Depression, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Euphoria, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Pictures, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review