Cited by 201Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFace Recognition and Perception

Human Olfactory Communication of Emotion

Chen, Denise, Haviland-Jones, Jeannette·2000·Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract

Nonhuman animals communicate their emotional states through changes in body odor. The study reported here suggests that this may be the same for humans. We collected underarm odors on gauze pads from 25 young women and men on two different occasions. On one occasion the donors were induced to feel happy by viewing an excerpt from a funny movie whereas on the other, separated by a day, they were induced to feel afraid by watching an excerpt from a frightening movie. One week later, 40 women and 37 men were asked to smell several different bottles, some of which contained underarm odor pads collected during the happy movie, some contained underarm odor pads collected during the frightening movie, whereas others contained unused pads (control odor). Each odor was identified on two separate tasks that involved identifying the odor from among three odors and identifying it again from among six odors. Data were the number of women and men who identified an odor correctly on both tasks. When asked to select which bottles contained "the odor of people when they are happy," women chose the correct bottles for both tasks significantly more often than chance. Men chose the bottle which contained the body odors collected when women (but not men) viewed the happy movie more often than would be expected by chance. When asked to select which bottles contained "the odor of people when they are afraid," women and men both chose the bottle that contained the body odors collected when men (but…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pms.2000.91.3.771

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, D., & Haviland-Jones, J.
Affiliations
  • Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Denise
Venue
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
2000-12
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
771-781
ISSN
  • 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-688X
OpenAlex
W2018597864
Cited by
201
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perceptual and Motor Skills (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (C2T32DC00014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
olfactory communication, emotional expression, body odor, emotion recognition, happiness, fear, sex differences, odor identification, nonverbal communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Fear, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Odorants, Smell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review