Cited by 6Head and Neck Cancer StudiesOral Health Pathology and TreatmentEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment

Personality, Smoking, and Alcohol as Synergistic Risk Factors for Cancer of the Mouth and Pharynx

Grossarth-Maticek, R., Eysenck, H. J.·1990·Psychological Reports

Abstract

34 male patients suffering from cancer of the mouth or pharynx were studied with reference to their personality type, smoking and drinking habits, and compared with a healthy sample of 1706 men. The three risk factors showed a strong tendency to be related to cancer only in combination, adding new evidence to the theory that risk factors in cancer act in a synergistic fashion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3.1024This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossarth-Maticek, R., & Eysenck, H. J.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
1990-12
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
1024-1026
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W4232281710
Cited by
6
References
8
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Keywords
oral cancer, pharyngeal cancer, personality types, smoking, alcohol consumption, synergistic risk factors, cancer risk factors, male patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review