PREDICTING BEHAVIOR OF HIGH AND LOW SELF-MONITORS: AN APPLICATION OF THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
Abstract
Using Ajzen's theory of planned behavior, behavioral intentions, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control were assessed for 24 high and for 29 low self-monitors. In addition, behavior (attendance at class lectures) was unobtrusively recorded. Intentions were best predicted by attitudes of the low and by subjective norms of the high self-monitoring groups. Low self-monitors' overt behavior was predicted by intentions, and high self-monitors' behavior by the interaction of intention × perceived behavioral control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Subjective norms predicted intentions to attend class only among high self monitors, with low self monitors' intentions being predicted by their attitudes.
“They found that subjective norms predicted intentions to attend class only among high self monitors, with low self monitors' intentions being predicted by their attitudes (see also DeBono & Omoto, 1993).”
From Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms (2009) · cites this paper as Prislin & Kovrlija, 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970 · see citing works
White, K. M., Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., Greenslade, J. H., & McKimmie, B. M. (2009) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466608x295207 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Salomon, I., & Brown, C. S. (2019) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431618770809 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Jewell, J., Spears Brown, C., & Perry, B. (2015) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12150 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Prislin, R., & Kovrlija, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Zagreb, Yugoslavia
- Venue
- Psychological Reports
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3_suppl
- Pages
- 1131-1138
- ISSN
- 0033-2941
- 1558-691X
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
