Cited by 46Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

All my friends are doing it: Potentially offensive sexual behavior perpetration within adolescent social networks

Jewell, Jennifer, Spears Brown, Christia, Perry, Brea·2015·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

The current study used social network analysis to investigate peer network and individual predictors of potentially offensive sexual behaviors among high school students. Ninth‐grade students (n = 308; 158 girls) completed surveys assessing their perpetration of potentially offensive sexual behaviors against their peers, as well as measures of their sexualized gender stereotypes and propensity to self‐monitor. Participants selected up to eight of their closest friends from a roster. Results revealed homophily of potentially offensive sexual behaviors, such that adolescents perpetrated similar amounts of physical/verbal, electronic, and homophobic behaviors as their friends. Characteristics of the peer network (e.g., mean network perpetration, centrality of individual, and gender composition) and the individual adolescent (e.g., gender, sexualized gender stereotypes, self‐monitoring) predicted adolescents’ own behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jora.12150

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similarities between Spanish and Italian adolescents in online sexual harassment understanding are partly attributed to social and cultural factors common to both Mediterranean countries, which have traditional gender patterns that support and legitimise sexist or aggressive behaviour among peers.

    “These similarities are partly attributed to social and cultural factors that are common to both these Mediterranean countries, which have traditional gender patterns that support and legitimise sexist or aggressive behaviour among peers (Jewell et al., 2015; Leaper & Brown, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jewell, J., Spears Brown, C., & Perry, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Kentucky
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-13
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
592-604
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W1995149094
Cited by
46
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Funders
Research Support Grant from the University of Kentucky Office of the Vice President for Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
homophily, self-monitoring, homophobia, cyberbullying, verbal sexual harassment, physical sexual harassment, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review