CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcomes for Psychiatric Patients following First Admission: Relationships with Voluntary and Involuntary Treatment and Ethnicity

Houston, Kimberlyn Gray, Mariotto, Marco, Hays, J. Ray·2001·Psychological Reports
DOI 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research suggests that there are ethnic differences in hospitalization outcomes for severely mentally ill patients. This study examined ethnic and sex differences in admission status, rapid readmission, and discharge placement of 487 patients on their first psychiatric admission. There were sex differences in admission status with significantly more male patients being involuntarily admitted than female patients. Ethnic differences in placement at discharge were not supported, but involuntarily admitted patients were over-represented in the less desirable outcome categories.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1012

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies found that following an involuntary admission people were more likely to be re-hospitalised than following voluntary admissions, over a wide range of time-periods.

    “Some studies found that following an involuntary admission people were more likely to be re-hospitalised than following voluntary admissions, over a wide range of time-periods (58–68).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037/0003-066X.45.3.347 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Houston, K. G., Mariotto, M., & Hays, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Texas Medical Center (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Hays, J. Ray
Venue
Psychological Reports
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-06
Volume
88
Issue
3_suppl
Pages
1012-1014
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
DOI
10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1012
OpenAlex
W2066562269
Cited by
34
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychiatric hospitalization, involuntary admission, voluntary admission, ethnic differences, sex differences, hospital readmission, first admission, severe mental illness, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Ethnicity, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review