Cited by 103Global Health Workforce IssuesNursing education and managementHealthcare Systems and Reforms

Lay worker attrition: important but often ignored

Open access
Nkonki, Lungiswa, Cliff, Julie, Sanders, David·2011·Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Abstract

Lay health workers are key to achieving universal health-care coverage, therefore measuring worker attrition and identifying its determinants should be an integral part of any lay health worker programme. Both published and unpublished research on lay health workers has largely focused on the types of interventions they can deliver effectively. This is an imperative since the main objective of these programmes is to improve health outcomes. However, high attrition rates can undermine the effectiveness of these programmes. There is a lack of research on lay health worker attrition. Research that aims to answer the following three key questions would help address this knowledge gap: what is the magnitude of attrition in programmes? What are the determinants of attrition? What are the most successful ways of reducing attrition? With community-based interventions and task shifting high on the United Nations Millennium Development Goals' policy agenda, research on lay health worker attrition and its determinants requires urgent attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2471/blt.11.087825

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bhutta ZA, Lassi ZS, Pariyo G, Huicho L. Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health-related Millennium Development Goals: a systematic review, country case studies and recommendations for scaling up. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nkonki, L., Cliff, J., & Sanders, D.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Venue
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publisher
WHO Press
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
89
Issue
12
Pages
919-923
ISSN
0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131648747
Cited by
103
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde
  • Universiteit Stellenbosch
  • Universitetet i Bergen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
lay health workers, community-based intervention, task shifting, universal health coverage, health workforce retention
MeSH terms
Workforce, Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Motivation, Personnel Turnover, Global Health, Universal Health Insurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review