Cited by 24HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses

Training outreach workers for AIDS prevention in rural India: is it sustainable?

Open access
Sivaram, S·2003·Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

Through a process of community diagnosis and participation, a non-governmental organization in rural Karnataka state in India selected and trained peer outreach workers to implement and sustain AIDS prevention education activities. This activity was part of a larger AIDS education project that aimed at creating awareness and promoting risk-reducing behaviours in the community. This paper describes efforts of the project to identify and train peer educators during its implementation phase and discusses strategies used to facilitate sustainability. We evaluate the impact of these efforts by conducting an analysis in the project area 2 years after the end of the project. The findings reveal generalized interest among rural communities in HIV prevention issues. The project originally conducted an extensive survey to understand community organization and composition, which helped to identify potential partners and peer educators. Training peer educators was a multi-step process, and one with high attrition. While individual peer educators were an excellent resource during the life of the project, peer educators affiliated with village level institutions had the interest, access to resources and willingness to sustain project efforts. However, the sustainability of their efforts was associated with the quality of interactions with the project implementation team, the strength and leadership of their own institutions, the perceived benefits of implementing AIDS education activities after project life and the gender of the outreach worker. Non-sustainers did not have an organizational structure to backstop their work, were often poor and unemployed persons who later found gainful employment, and overwhelmingly, were female. We present a conceptual model based on these findings to help future projects plan for and achieve sustainability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/heapol/czg049

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Celia G, Hannibal M. 1998. Doing Qualitative Analysis with QSR Nud.ist4. London: Sage Publications.
  2. Dasgupta PR, Rao AR 1993. Establishing partnership with NGOs by the National AIDS Control Programme, India. International Conference on AIDS, June 6-11, abstract no. PO-D13-3715.
  3. Fernandez, A. 1990. Alternate management systems for savings and credit for the rural poor: the MYRADA experience. Bangalore: Prithvi Press.
  4. Rogers E. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sivaram, S.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Sivaram, S
Venue
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
411-420
ISSN
  • 0268-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2237
OpenAlex
W2126561626
Cited by
24
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Policy and Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Keywords
HIV prevention, peer educators, outreach workers, program sustainability, community participation, community diagnosis, rural communities, non-governmental organizations, training attrition, village institutions, Karnataka
MeSH terms
Workforce, Community Health Workers, Community-Institutional Relations, Health Education, Humans, India, Organizations, Peer Group, Program Evaluation, HIV Infections, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review