CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 405Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityDigital Economy and Work TransformationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economics of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Future of Work

Open access
Ernst, Ekkehardt, Merola, Rossana, Samaan, Daniel·2019·IZA Journal of Labor Policy
DOI 10.2478/izajolp-2019-0004
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The current wave of technological change based on advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) has created widespread fear of job loss and further rises in inequality. This paper discusses the rationale for these fears, highlighting the specific nature of AI and comparing previous waves of automation and robotization with the current advancements made possible by a widespread adoption of AI. It argues that large opportunities in terms of increases in productivity can ensue, including for developing countries, given the vastly reduced costs of capital that some applications have demonstrated and the potential for productivity increases, especially among the low skilled. At the same time, risks in the form of further increases in inequality need to be addressed if the benefits from AI-based technological progress are to be broadly shared. For this, skills policies are necessary but not sufficient. In addition, new forms of regulating the digital economy are called for that prevent further rises in market concentration, ensure proper data protection and privacy, and help share the benefits of productivity growth through the combination of profit sharing, (digital) capital taxation, and a reduction in working time. The paper calls for a moderately optimistic outlook on the opportunities and risks from AI, provided that policymakers and social partners take the particular characteristics of these new technologies into account.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/izajolp-2019-0004

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Agrawal, A. K.; (2018b): Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence. NBER Working Paper No. 24690. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Bessen, J.; (2015b): Learning by Doing: The Real Connection Between Innovation, Wages, and Wealth. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  3. Culey, S. (2012): Transformers: Supply Chain 3.0 and how Automation will Transform the Rules of the Global Supply Chain. The European Business Review (Online).
  4. Ernst, E.; Chentouf, L. (2014): Work Organisation and Incentives. Global and Local Economies Review 18(1), 103-135.
  5. Logg, J. M.; J. A. Minson; D. A. Moore (2018): Algorithm Appreciation: People Prefer Algorithmic to Human Judgment. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 17-086. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  6. UNCTAD. (2016): Robots and Industrialization in Developing Countries. Policy Brief No. 50. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 402

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ernst, E., Merola, R., & Samaan, D.
Affiliations
  • Research Department, International Labour Organisation , Route des Morillons 4, 1211 Geneva , Switzerland
  • International Labour Organization (CH)
ORCID
Samaan, Daniel
Venue
IZA Journal of Labor Policy
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2019-06-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2193-9004 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2478/izajolp-2019-0004
OpenAlex
W2969615692
Cited by
405
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 7
FWCI
39.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IZA Journal of Labor Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence, future of work, job displacement, inequality, productivity growth, automation, robotization, low-skilled workers, skills policy, digital economy regulation, market concentration, data protection, profit sharing, working time reduction, developing countries, technological change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review