Cited by 25Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Remote Consultations in General Practice—A Systematic Review

Open access
Vodička, Staša, Zelko, Erika·2022·Slovenian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Introduction: Remote consultations in general practice can be very useful form of telemedicine, which is basically a way to exchange medical information to improve the clinical health of patients when the patient and their general practitioner (GP) are not on the same place at the same time. This concept was developed in the 1980s to provide health care to patients who lived in remote areas. Methods: We were interested in researching what kind of remote consultations are available in general practice and what is the usage of these methods. We used four keywords – remote consultation and general practice or family medicine or primary care – and we searched in four different scientific databases: Medline–PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEX Xplore. Results: We used a PRISMA diagram to identify studies and search the four main databases, we investigated 48 full text articles and when we applied our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were included in this systematic review. Conclusions: This systematic review covers the topics of remote consultation versus a traditional or classic physical consultation. Studies have shown its importance prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and its value while in the mist of the pandemic then caring for infected patients. We have found that remote consultation is necessary, but it must be an improvement on the previous system. Teleconsultations can reduce the number of visits, especially during lockdown situations, with both patients and GPs satisfied with the method, but we should not forget that a physical consultation cannot be fully replaced by a remote consultation due to the limitations of the latter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/sjph-2022-0030

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent years, remote consultations have been utilized to provide a safer alternative option for patients and clinicians while also preventing the spread of infections in the clinical space.

    “In recent years, remote consultations have been utilized to provide a safer alternative option for patients and clinicians while also preventing the spread of infections in the clinical space [236].”

    From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [236]

    The Introduction says remote consultations enabled patient care from a safe distance during COVID-19, and the Discussion describes them as an alternative to physical consultations that can reduce visits. Our copy does not state that they prevented the spread of infections in clinical spaces; that part of the claim goes beyond what the review reports. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vodička, S., & Zelko, E.
Affiliations
  • Murska Sobota Community Health Centre , Grajska ulica 24, 9000 Murska Sobota , Slovenia
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Corresponding author
Vodička, Staša
Venue
Slovenian Journal of Public Health
Published
2022-09-28
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
224-230
ISSN
  • 0351-0026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1854-2476
OpenAlex
W4301397325
Cited by
19
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Slovenian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
teleconsultation, telemedicine, general practice, primary care, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, patient satisfaction, GP satisfaction, remote area healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review