Cited by 486Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and ChallengesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study

Open access
Murphy, Mairead, Scott, Lauren J, Salisbury, Chris, Turner, Andrew, Scott, Anne, Denholm, Rachel, Lewis, Rhys, Iyer, Geeta +2 more·2021·British Journal of General Practice

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: To reduce contagion of COVID-19, in March 2020 UK general practices implemented predominantly remote consulting via telephone, video, or online consultation platforms. Aim: To investigate the rapid implementation of remote consulting and explore impact over the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design and setting: Mixed-methods study in 21 general practices in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire. Method: Longitudinal observational quantitative analysis compared volume and type of consultation in April to July 2020 with April to July 2019. Negative binomial models were used to identify if changes differed among different groups of patients. Qualitative data from 87 longitudinal interviews with practice staff in four rounds investigated practices’ experience of the move to remote consulting, challenges faced, and solutions. A thematic analysis utilised Normalisation Process Theory. Results: There was universal consensus that remote consulting was necessary. This drove a rapid change to 90% remote GP consulting (46% for nurses) by April 2020. Consultation rates reduced in April to July 2020 compared to 2019; GPs and nurses maintained a focus on older patients, shielding patients, and patients with poor mental health. Telephone consulting was sufficient for many patient problems, video consulting was used more rarely, and was less essential as lockdown eased. SMS-messaging increased more than three-fold. GPs were concerned about increased clinical risk and some had difficulties setting thresholds for seeing patients face-to-face as lockdown eased. Conclusion: The shift to remote consulting was successful and a focus maintained on vulnerable patients. It was driven by the imperative to reduce contagion and may have risks; post-pandemic, the model will need adjustment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0948

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, M., Scott, L. J., Salisbury, C., Turner, A., Scott, A., Denholm, R., Lewis, R., Iyer, G., Macleod, J., & Horwood, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2021-01-17
Volume
71
Issue
704
Pages
e166-e177
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W3119657379
Cited by
486
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 54
FWCI
84.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR202406, NIHR201314)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • University of Bristol
  • NIHR School for Primary Care Research
  • National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, primary care, general practice, telephone consultation, video consultation, teleconsultation, Normalisation Process Theory, vulnerable patients, shielding, mental health, text messaging, clinical risk
MeSH terms
Change Management, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communicable Disease Control, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Remote Consultation, Practice Patterns, Nurses', General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review