The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EUV Resist Process Performance Investigations on the NXE3100 Full Field Scanner
Open accessAbstract
Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography is a candidate for device manufacturing at the 22nm half pitch node and beyond. The key challenge for EUV resists remains to simultaneously meet the requirements for Sensitivity, Resolution and Line-edge-roughness (LER) for Line/Space features (LS), respectively local CD uniformity (LCDU) for Contact holes (CH). The introduction of the ASML NXE:3100 pre-production EUV scanner at Imec, with off-axis illumination provides resolution capability well below 22nm. In this paper we make a assessment of the EUV resist performance for 22nm LS and 28-26nm contacts on the NXE:3100. At 22nm feature sizes, pattern collapse and LER become the main resolution and process windows limiters. The application of FIRMTM Extreme 10 rinse was found to be effective to improve the collapse margin and reduce LER on several resists. Using dipole illumination setting, we achieved 22nm LS at 13.5mJ/cm2 with 3.1nm (3σ) LER with wide processing latitudes. Several resists resolved down to 20nm LS. Champion resolution of 19nm LS was obtained in one resist at 20mJ/cm2. Using quasar illumination, 28nm HP contact holes were obtained with LCDU value of 1.0nm (1σ) at <20mJ/cm2, showing wide process latitudes. Printing 26nm HP contacts is feasible but requires further improvement in LCDU and contact shape circularity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EUV resist performance: current assessment for sub-22-nm half-pitch patterning on NXE:3300
Wallow, T., Civay, D. E., Wang, S., Hoefnagels, H. F., Verspaget, C., Tanriseven, G., Fumar-Pici, A., Hansen, S. G., Schefske, J., Singh, M., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.918039 · Cited by 26
Quantification of shot noise contributions to contact hole local CD nonuniformity
Gronheid, R., Winroth, G., Pret, A. V., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.916681 · Cited by 19
Progress in EUV lithography towards manufacturing from an exposure tool perspective
Hermans, J. V., Laidler, D. W., Foubert, P., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.917616 · Cited by 16
Self-citationKey parameters of EUV resists for contact hole applications
Cho, K., Nakagawa, H., Maruyama, K., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.916837 · Cited by 13
Ban, K., Heo, J., Shim, H., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.916119 · Cited by 12
Latest cluster performance for EUV lithography
Shite, H., Matsunaga, K., Nafus, K., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.916388 · Cited by 10
Recent Advancements in EUV Resist Materials and Process Performance
Goethals, A. M., Niroomand, A., Roey, F. V., et al. (2011) · Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology · doi:10.2494/photopolymer.24.25 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [1] E. Hendrickx, J. Hermans, G. Lorusso, V. Philipsen, Ph. Foubert, I. Pollentier, M. Goethals, R. Jonckheere, G. Vandenberghe and K. Ronse, $ldquo;From ASML Alpha Demo Tool to ASML NXE:3100 at Imec”, 2011 International Symposium on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography, October 17-19, 2011, Miami, USA.
- [3] A.M. Goethals, A. Niroomand, K. Ban, K. Hosokawa, F. Van Roey, O. Pollentier, D. Van den Heuvel and K. Ronse, 2010 EUVL symposium, October 17-20, 2010, Kobe, Japan.
- [4] A.M. Goethals, A. Niroomand, K. Hosokawa, F. Van Roey, I. Pollentier and D. Van den Heuvel, “EUV resist performance update on ADT and NXE:3100 scanner”, 2011 International Symposium on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography, October 17-19, 2011, Miami, USA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extreme ultraviolet lithography
Kazazis, D., Santaclara, J. G., van Schoot, J., Mochi, I., & Ekinci, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00361-z · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Goethals, A.-M., Foubert, P., Hosokawa, K., Roey, F. V., Niroomand, A., Heuvel, D. V. D., & Pollentier, I.
- Affiliations
- IMEC (BE)
- Micron (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 559-567
- ISSN
- 0914-9244 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-6336
- OpenAlex
- W1973123888
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
- Keywords
- EUV lithography, EUV resist, line edge roughness, pattern collapse, dipole illumination, off-axis illumination, 22 nm technology node, resist sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review