Cited by 34Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsFormal Methods in VerificationAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control

Safe Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Logic Shields

Open access
Yang, Wen-Chi, Marra, Giuseppe, Rens, Gavin, De Raedt, Luc·2023·Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Safe Reinforcement learning (Safe RL) aims at learning optimal policies while staying safe. A popular solution to Safe RL is shielding, which uses a logical safety specification to prevent an RL agent from taking unsafe actions. However, traditional shielding techniques are difficult to integrate with continuous, end-to-end deep RL methods. To this end, we introduce Probabilistic Logic Policy Gradient (PLPG). PLPG is a model-based Safe RL technique that uses probabilistic logic programming to model logical safety constraints as differentiable functions. Therefore, PLPG can be seamlessly applied to any policy gradient algorithm while still providing the same convergence guarantees. In our experiments, we show that PLPG learns safer and more rewarding policies compared to other state-of-the-art shielding techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2023/637

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Yang, W.-C., Marra, G., Rens, G., & De Raedt, L.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Leuven AI, KU Leuven, Belgium
Venue
Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2023-08
Pages
5739-5749
OpenAlex
W4385764501
Cited by
34
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
6.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1239422N)
  • KU Leuven
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Keywords
safe reinforcement learning, shielding, probabilistic logic programming, policy gradient, model-based reinforcement learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-01.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review