A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformers
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in Transformers have come with a huge requirement on computing resources, highlighting the importance of developing efficient training techniques to make Transformer training faster, at lower cost, and to higher accuracy by the efficient use of computation and memory resources. This survey provides the first systematic overview of the efficient training of Transformers, covering the recent progress in acceleration arithmetic and hardware, with a focus on the former. We analyze and compare methods that save computation and memory costs for intermediate tensors during training, together with techniques on hardware/algorithm co-design. We finally discuss challenges and promising areas for future research.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey systematically reviews efficient training techniques for Transformers, focusing on computation efficiency, memory efficiency, and hardware/algorithm co-design. It argues that training large Transformers is bottlenecked by intensive computation and growing memory demands, and it catalogs methods to reduce cost while maintaining accuracy.
Key findings
- Training large Transformers is extremely resource-intensive: the paper cites an estimate that NAS-trained Transformer base models produce about 626,155 pounds of CO₂, and that GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters and would take 355 GPU-years and at least $4.6M for one training run.
- Computation-efficiency methods include better optimizers (AdamW, Lion, SAM variants), initialization schemes (Fixup, ReZero, SkipInit, T-Fixup, ConViT), sparse training, overparameterization, large-batch training, incremental learning, token masking, and importance sampling.
- Memory-efficiency methods include parallelism (DP, MP, TP, PP), quantized training, rematerialization/offloading, and parameter-efficient tuning; for example, AMP trains DeiT-B 2× faster (305 vs. 124 images/s) and uses 22% less peak GPU memory (7.9GB vs. 10.2GB).
- Hardware/algorithm co-design examples report large gains: OuterSPACE achieves 7.9× speedup over CPU and 14.0× over GPU; DOTA achieves 152.6× speedup over GPU; ELSA achieves 58.1× speedup and three orders of magnitude energy improvement over an Nvidia V100.
Methods
- Design: a survey providing “the first systematic overview of the efficient training of Transformers,” organizing methods by technical innovation and primary use case.
- Scope: covers computation efficiency, memory efficiency, and hardware/algorithm co-design, with primary focus on arithmetic innovations and a brief discussion of hardware/algorithm co-design.
- Analysis: qualitative synthesis and comparison of published methods, including a summary table of memory-efficient training methods; no new experiments or primary datasets are introduced.
Limitations
- The paper states that it leaves the review of hardware accelerator design, “a broad class,” as future work.
- The paper states that a standard benchmark to evaluate and compare efficient training methods is still needed and is listed as a promising future direction.
- Evident from the text: as a survey, it does not report original experimental results, controlled comparisons, or a unified benchmark; its quantitative claims are drawn from cited works.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 81 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Empirically, training Transformers with Adam performs better than training them with SGD.
“Empirically, training Transformers with Adam outperforms the SGD counterpart, and [Zhang et al., 2019b] demystifies that a heavy-tailed distribution of the noise in stochastic gradients is the main cause of SGD's poor performance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The largest language model grew from 345M parameters with BERT-large in 2018 to hundreds of billions with models such as MT-NLG at 530B parameters.
“the largest language model in literature grows from 345M with BERT-large [Kenton and Toutanova, 2019] in 2018, to hundreds of billions till now with models such as MT-NLG [Smith et al., 2022] equipped with 530B parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kenton and Toutanova, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smith et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Pipeline parallelism suffers from pipeline bubbles, or accelerator idle time, that reduce efficiency.
“However, it still suffers from pipeline bubbles (accelerator idle time) that reduce efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Applying SAM to Transformers yields significant accuracy gains by smoothing the loss surface.
“The following work [Chen et al., 2022] applies SAM to Transformer, observing significant accuracy gains via smoothing the loss surface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
SGD can converge to global minima on the training objective of DNNs in polynomial time, assuming training samples are not duplicated and the number of parameters is polynomial in the number of training samples and network depth.
“[Allen-Zhu et al., 2019b] proves that SGD can converge to global minima on the training objective of DNNs in polynomial time, assuming training samples are not duplicated, and the number of parameters is polynomial in the number of training samples and network depth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen-Zhu et al., 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
SAM nearly doubles training time because it must solve a bi-level min-max optimization problem.
“However, SAM needs to solve a bi-level min-max optimization problem, which nearly doubles the training time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
ReZero and SkipInit initialize each layer to perform the identity operation by adding a learnable scaling multiplier initialized to zero.
“the following works ReZero [Bachlechner et al., 2021] and SkipInit [De and Smith, 2020] simply initialize each layer to perform the identity operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bachlechner et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites De and Smith, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
For language-image pre-training, randomly masking and removing masked image patches gives 3.7 times faster overall pre-training time than the original CLIP.
“A similar phenomenon is also found in [Li et al., 2022b] that for language-image pre-training, randomly masking and removing the masked image patches shows 3.7× faster overall pre-training time than the original CLIP [Radford et al., 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2022b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Radford et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Importance sampling over data is theoretically guaranteed to accelerate stochastic gradient algorithms for supervised learning by prioritizing informative training examples, mainly through variance reduction.
“Importance sampling over data, also known as data pruning, is theoretically guaranteed to accelerate stochastic gradient algorithms for supervised learning by prioritizing informative training examples, mainly benefiting from variance reduction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premiseown data
Memory consumption in existing model training frameworks is occupied by model states, including optimizer states, gradients and parameters, and by activations.
“We first analyze the memory consumption of the existing model training frameworks, which is occupied by 1) model states, including optimizer states (e.g., momentum and variance in Adam), gradients and parameters; and 2) activations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Increasing depth as overparameterization in linear neural networks can accelerate SGD convergence.
“The early work [Arora et al., 2018] mathematically proves that increasing depth as overparameterization in linear neural networks can accelerate SGD convergence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arora et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
T-Fixup attributes part of the optimization difficulty to unstable early updates in Adam, because the variance of the second-order momentum is unbounded.
“T-Fixup [Huang et al., 2020] analyzes that part of the optimization difficulty comes from the unstable early updates in the Adam optimizer as the variance of the second-order momentum is unbounded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Simple average gradient norms or error L2-norms over several weight initializations can identify important examples at a very early stage in training.
“[Paul et al., 2021] further speeds up the sampling process similar to the early-bird LTH, but in the data domain, that simple average gradient norms or error ℓ 2 -norms over several weight initializations can be used to identify important examples at the very early stage in training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paul et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
For Transformers, automatic mixed-precision training is the most widely adopted approach.
“For Transformers, the most widely adopted approach is automatic mixed-precision (AMP) training [Micikevicius et al., 2018].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Micikevicius et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Data parallelism by itself is only suitable for training small to moderate models.
“Therefore, DP itself is only suitable for training small to moderate models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Li et al. 2020 uses overparameterization theory to design an efficient training pipeline: train a very large model, perform early stopping, and heavily compress it, analogous to LTH.
“Applied to Transformers, [Li et al., 2020] exploits the faster convergence and better generalization from the overparameterization theory to design an efficient training pipeline: training a very large model, then perform early stopping and heavily compress it, analogous to LTH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The growing model size of large Transformer models is a key training bottleneck because they do not fit into the memory of a single device.
“Apart from the computation burden, the growing model size of large Transformer models, e.g., from BERT [Kenton and Toutanova, 2019] 345M parameter model to GPT-3 of 1.75 trillion parameters, is a key bottleneck for training as they do not fit into the memory of a single device.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kenton and Toutanova, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Megatron-LM* and DeepSpeed compose tensor, pipeline, and data parallelism to scale training to thousands of GPUs.
“For example, Megatron-LM * [Narayanan et al., 2021] and DeepSpeed [Rasley et al., 2020] compose tensor, pipeline, and data parallelism to scale training to thousands of GPUs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Narayanan et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rasley et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A dense randomly initialized network contains subnetworks, called winning tickets, that can be trained in isolation to match the original network's accuracy.
“The reliability was first demonstrated by the lottery ticket hypothesis (LTH) [Frankle and Carbin, 2019] that a dense, randomly initialized network contains subnetworks (winning tickets) which can be trained in isolation to match the accuracy of the original network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frankle and Carbin, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A multi-head self-attention layer with N heads and relative positional encoding of dimension at least 3 can be reparameterized to express any convolutional layer with filter size sqrt(N) by sqrt(N).
“[Cordonnier et al., 2020] proves that a multi-head self-attention layer with N heads and a relative positional encoding with dimension D ≥ 3 can be reparameterized to express any convolutional layer of filter size √ N × √ N .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cordonnier et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The extra parameters of addition-based parameter-efficient tuning introduce additional computation and memory overhead during inference.
“However, the extra parameters introduce additional computation and memory overhead during inference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Because of irregular sparsity, sparse general matrix multiplication is often hardware unfriendly to general-purpose processors such as CPUs and GPUs.
“However, due to the irregular sparsity, SpGEMM is often hardware unfriendly to general-purpose processors, such as CPUs and GPUs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
DOTA identifies unimportant connections in attention using low-rank transformation and low-precision computation.
“The following work DOTA [Qu et al., 2022] identifies unimportant connections in attention using low-rank transformation and low-precision computation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Qu et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Sparse general matrix multiplication takes advantage of the sparsity of attention matrices to reduce the number of computations.
“sparse general matrix multiplication (SpGEMM), which involves multiplying a sparse matrix with a dense matrix, takes advantage of the sparsity of the attention matrices to reduce the number of computations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Large language pretrained models have low intrinsic dimension.
“Inspired by the observation that large language pretrained models have low intrinsic dimension [Aghajanyan et al., 2021]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aghajanyan et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Low-precision arithmetic can be combined with other techniques such as pruning and low-rank approximation to achieve further acceleration.
“Moreover, low-precision arithmetic can be combined with other techniques, such as pruning and low-rank approximation, to achieve further acceleration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Designing efficient hardware accelerators enables faster training and inference for deep neural networks.
“Apart from computing and memory burden, designing efficient hardware accelerators enables faster training and inference for DNNs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
FlashAttention exploits tiling to reduce the I/O communication between GPU high bandwidth memory and on-chip SRAM.
“Notably, FlashAttention [Dao et al., 2022] proposes to exploit tiling to reduce the I/O communication between GPU high bandwidth memory (HBM) and on-chip SRAM”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dao et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Specialized hardware accelerators such as FPGAs and ASICs are required to handle the poor data locality issue of sparse general matrix multiplication.
“To handle this, specialized hardware accelerators, such as FPGAs and ASICs, are required to handle the poor data locality issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
ELSA filters out irrelevant keys for a particular query based on hashing similarity to save computation.
“ELSA [Ham et al., 2021] filters out irrelevant keys for a particular query based on the hashing similarity to save computation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ham et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
ZeRO-Offload offers an optimal offloading strategy customized to mixed-precision training with the Adam optimizer.
“A representative work is ZeRO-Offload [Ren et al., 2021], which offers optimal offloading strategy customized to mixed-precision training with Adam optimizer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ren et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recent work customizes ACT to support memory-efficient Transformer training.
“Recent work [Pan et al., 2021;Liu et al., 2022] further propose to customize ACT to support memory-efficient Transformer training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pan et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A3 selects only those keys that are likely to have high similarity with the given queries, in order to reduce the amount of computation in attention.
“A 3 [Ham et al., 2020] only selects those keys that are likely to have high similarity with the given queries to reduce the amount of computation in attention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ham et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
By incorporating token-level parallelism and out-of-order execution, DOTA achieves a 152.6 times speedup over GPU.
“By incorporating token-level parallelism and out-of-order execution, DOTA achieves a 152.6× speedup over GPU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 48
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 34
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLion generally converges faster and is more memory-efficient and accurate than AdamW for training Transformers on various benchmarks.
“In practice, Lion in general converges faster, and is more memory-efficient and accurate than AdamW for training Transformers on various benchmarks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTraining a Transformer base model with neural architecture search produces roughly 626,155 pounds of carbon dioxide, comparable to the lifetime emissions of five cars.
“A widely discussed energy study of deep learning models [Strubell et al., 2019] estimates that training a Transformer base model with neural architecture search (NAS) [So et al., 2019] produces about 626,155 pounds of planet-warming carbon dioxide, equal to the lifetime emissions of five cars”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Strubell et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites So et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdamW is the most widely used optimizer for Transformers by default.
“By default, AdamW [Loshchilov and Hutter, 2019], a variant of Adam which decouples the L 2 regularization and the weight decay, is the most widely used optimizer for Transformers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Loshchilov and Hutter, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGPT-3 was trained on half a trillion words and has 175 billion parameters.
“GPT-3 [Brown et al., 2020] (the precursor to ChatGPT) was trained on half a trillion words and equips with 175 billion parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLTH requires identifying winning tickets through alternating train-prune-retrain, which makes training very costly for large models and datasets.
“However, LTH requires identifying the winning tickets in an alternating train-prune-retrain manner, which makes the training extremely costly for large models and datasets, limiting the practical benefits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frankle and Carbin, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationZeRO combines uniform partitioning with data parallelism, where each data parallel process handles one partition of model states in a mixed precision regime.
“More recently, ZeRO [Rajbhandari et al., 2020] incorporates uniform partitioning strategy with DP, where each data parallel process merely deals with one partition of model states, working in a mixed precision regime.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rajbhandari et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFixup rescales standard initialization to maintain proper gradient norm and can train very deep networks with over 10,000 layers without adding normalization layers.
“Fixup [Zhang et al., 2019a] proposes to properly rescale a standard initialization to ensure proper gradient norm to avoid exploding or vanishing gradients, which can train very deep networks with over 10,000 layers without adding normalization layers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConViT controls locality by adding a soft gating parameter that balances content and positional terms, incorporating soft convolutional inductive biases into global self-attention.
“ConViT [d' Ascoli et al., 2021] learns to control the locality by adding a soft gating parameter to balance the two terms, which has the effect of incorporating soft convolutional inductive biases into global self-attention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites d' Ascoli et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAveraging the weights of a certain number of latest checkpoints can facilitate faster training.
“[Kaddour, 2022] shows that averaging the weights of a certain number of latest checkpoints can facilitate faster training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaddour, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSparse training directly trains sparse subnetworks from scratch instead of full networks without sacrificing accuracy.
“The key idea of sparse training is to directly train sparse subnetworks instead of the full networks from scratch without sacrificing accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOverparameterization empirically improves both convergence and generalization, although theoretical guarantees are not sufficient.
“It is observed that overparameterization empirically improves both convergence and generalization, with theoretical guarantee though not sufficient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSharpness-aware minimization aims to minimize both loss value and loss sharpness, based on the idea that a flatter minimum tends to improve generalization.
“Sharpnessaware minimization (SAM) [Foret et al., 2021] seeks to simultaneously minimize loss value and loss sharpness, based on the connection between the geometry of the loss landscape and generalization, i.e., a flatter minimum tends to improve generalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Foret et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProgressively increasing input image resolution, by reducing patch size, can significantly accelerate ViT training, consistent with training dynamics that focus on low-frequency structure early and high-frequency semantics later.
“A key observation is that progressively increasing the resolution of the input images (reducing the patch size) can significantly accelerate ViT training, aligning with the widely known training dynamics that focus on low-frequency structure in the early stage and high-frequency semantics in the latter stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2022a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParameter sharing, known as Albert, improves the scalability of data parallelism for Transformers but limits representational power.
“To improve the scalability of DP, one solution for Transformer is parameter sharing [Lan et al., 2020], known as Albert, but it limits the representational power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lan et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAMP keeps a full-precision master copy of weights for updates while storing activations, gradients and weights in FP16 for arithmetic.
“Specifically, AMP stores a master copy of weights in full-precision for updates while the activations, gradients and weights are stored in FP16 for arithmetic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Micikevicius et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSkipping processing of masked tokens gives considerable training efficiency gains for MLM and MIM because reducing sequence length lowers computational and memory complexity quadratically.
“Since squeezing the sequence length reduces both the computational and memory complexity quadratically, skipping processing the masked tokens brings considerable training efficiency gain for MLM and MIM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe initialization methods discussed remove batch or layer normalization from all blocks and train without learning rate warmup.
“All the above-mentioned methods remove batch/layer normalization from all blocks and train without learning rate warmup.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLARS for SGD and LAMB for Adam propose layerwise adaptive learning rates for ResNet and Transformers respectively.
“The widely used methods are LARS [You et al., 2017] for SGD and LAMB [You et al., 2019] for Adam, which propose to use layerwise adaptive learning rates for ResNet and Transformers respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites You et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites You et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTraining over 400 Transformer language models with varying model sizes and token counts led to the practical hypothesis that model size and number of training tokens should be scaled equally for compute-optimal LLM training.
“DeepMind in [Hoffmann et al., 2022] trains over 400 Transformer language models with varying scales of model size and # of training tokens, reaching to a practical hypothesis that the model size and the number of training tokens should be scaled equally for compute-optimal LLM training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoffmann et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA sufficiently overparameterized three-layer neural network generalizes to the population risk, and an accurate network exists near any point on the SGD training trajectory with high probability over random initialization.
“[Allen-Zhu et al., 2019a] theoretically proves that a sufficiently overparameterized (three-layer) neural network generalizes to the population risk and an intriguing property is that there exists an accurate network in the close neighborhood of any point on the SGD training trajectory with high probability over random initialization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen-Zhu et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGoyal et al. used linear scaling of the learning rate to train ResNet-50 on ImageNet with batch size 8,192 in one hour.
“[Goyal et al., 2017] employs the linear scaling of the learning rate to train ResNet-50 on ImageNet with a batch size of 8,192 in 1 hour.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goyal et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitationtorchgpipe performs micro-batch pipeline parallelism with checkpointing, allowing scaling to a large number of micro-batches to minimize bubble overhead.
“In particular, PyTorch implements the torchgpipe [Kim et al., 2020], which performs micro-batch PP with checkpointing, allowing scaling to a large number of micro-batches to minimize the bubble overhead.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMegatron-LM slices both multi-head self-attention and feed-forward networks across GPUs and needs only a few extra All-Reduce operations in the forward and backward pass, allowing training of models up to 8.3 billion parameters using 512 GPUs.
“Customized to Transformerbased models, Megatron-LM [Shoeybi et al., 2019] slices both MSA and FFN across GPUs and requires only a few extra All-Reduce operations in the forward and backward pass, allowing them to train models up to 8.3 billion parameters using 512 GPUs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shoeybi et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningData parallelism has high communication and computation efficiency but poor memory efficiency; when the model becomes large, a single device cannot store the model replica and synchronized gradient communications can hinder scalability.
“However, it is obvious that DP has high communication/computation efficiency but poor memory efficiency -when model becomes large, the single device cannot store the model replica and the synchronized communications for gradients can hinder the scalability of DP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor DNNs, a principal way to estimate per-sample importance is gradient norm, and approximations make calculating these norms tractable.
“For DNNs, a principal way of estimating per-sample importance is to use gradient norm, and [Katharopoulos and Fleuret, 2018;Johnson and Guestrin, 2018] use different approximations to make calculating these norms tractable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Katharopoulos and Fleuret, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Johnson and Guestrin, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLarge batch training reduces the variance of stochastic gradient estimates, so a reliable step size must be tuned for better convergence.
“From the statistical view, large batch training reduces the variance of the stochastic gradient estimates, so a reliable step size needs to be tuned for better convergence [Bottou et al., 2018].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bottou et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenModel parallelism has good memory efficiency but low communication and computation efficiency due to high-volume data transfer across devices and poor processing element utilization.
“Though MP has good memory efficiency, its communication and computation efficiency is low due to high volume data transfer cross devices and poor PE utilization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationReduced precision training can accelerate neural network training with favorable performance.
“It has been shown in previous works that reduced precision training [Zhou et al., 2016;Hubara et al., 2017] can accelerate neural network training with favorable performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zhou et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hubara et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe scaling of test error with dataset size can break beyond power scaling laws and be reduced to at least exponential scaling if a superior data pruning metric is used.
“[Sorscher et al., 2022] shows an exciting analytic theory that the scaling of test error with dataset size can break beyond power scaling laws and be reduced to at least exponential scaling if equipped with a superior data pruning metric”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sorscher et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor deep vision Transformers, channel-wise learnable scaling factors and re-introducing warmup and layer normalization can make training more stable.
“On training deep vision Transformers (ViT), [Touvron et al., 2021a] proposes channel-wise learnable scaling factors and empirically ob-serve that re-introducing the warmup and layer normalization techniques can make training more stable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Touvron et al., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenData parallelism and model parallelism are orthogonal and can be used together to train larger models with higher computation and memory capacity.
“Note that DP and MP are orthogonal and so one can use both simultaneously to train larger models with higher computation and memory capacity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn vision, removing masked image patches before the encoder gives stronger performance and at least 3 times lower overall pre-training time and memory than keeping masked tokens.
“For MIM, representative work [He et al., 2022] shows that in vision, removing the masked image patches before the encoder demonstrates stronger performance and 3× or more lower overall pre-training time and memory consumption than keeping the masked tokens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationActivation compressed training stores low-precision approximate copies of activations while computing the forward pass exactly, reducing overall memory consumption during training.
“Apart from reduced precision training which simul-taneously quantizes activations/weights/gradients, activation compressed training (ACT) [Chen et al., 2021a] stores lowprecision approximate copies of activations while computing the forward pass exactly, which helps to reduce the overall memory consumption during training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2021a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWith batch size 64 and image resolution 224 by 224, training DeiT-B on RTX3090 under AMP is 2 times faster than full-precision training, 305 versus 124 images per second, and uses 22% less peak GPU memory, 7.9GB versus 10.2GB.
“For example, based on a batch size of 64 and image resolution of 224 × 224, training a DeiT-B [Touvron et al., 2021b] on RTX3090 under AMP is 2× faster than full-precision training (305 vs. 124 images/s), as well as consuming 22% less peak GPU memory (7.9GB vs. 10.2GB).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Touvron et al., 2021b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA tensor processing unit designed by Google delivered 30 to 80 times higher performance-per-watt than contemporary CPUs and GPUs.
“a tensor processing unit (TPU) designed by Google delivered 30∼80× higher performance-per-watt than contemporary CPUs and GPUs [Jouppi et al., 2017].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jouppi et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHigher data efficiency achieved by sampling informative training samples leads towards more efficient neural scaling laws of test error with respect to dataset size.
“2) higher data efficiency by sampling informative training samples towards more efficient neural scaling laws of test error with respect to dataset size;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningHardware-algorithm co-design takes the constraints and capabilities of the hardware into account when designing the algorithm, in order to optimize the training efficiency of DNNs, especially Transformers.
“To further optimize the training efficiency of DNNs, especially Transformers, hardware-algorithm co-design takes the constraints and capabilities of the hardware into account when designing the algorithm”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAppropriate initialization and optimization paradigms can accelerate the convergence rate with fewer training iterations, resulting in lower computational costs.
“1) appropriate initialization and optimization paradigms that can accelerate the convergence rate with fewer training iterations, resulting in lower computational costs;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSanger rearranges the sparse attention masks into structured blocks that are handled by reconfigurable hardware.
“Then, the sparse attention masks are rearranged into structured blocks and handled by reconfigurable hardware.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBeaumont et al. proposes jointly optimizing activation offloading and rematerialization.
“For the best of both worlds, [Beaumont et al., 2021] proposes to jointly optimize activation offloading and rematerialization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beaumont et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRematerialization, also called checkpointing, is a widely used space-time tradeoff that stores only a portion of activations or weights during the forward pass and recomputes the rest during the backward pass.
“Rematerialization, also known as checkpointing [Chen et al., 2016], is a widely used technique for space-time tradeoff that only stores a portion of activations/weights during the forward pass and recomputes the rest during the backward pass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFor applications focused on specific computation tasks, application-specific integrated circuits have the advantage of low power consumption and high training and inference speed.
“For applications that focus on specific computation tasks, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) have the advantage of low power consumption, and high training/inference speed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningEfficiently tuning readily available pretrained models is becoming a prevailing way to drastically cut training costs.
“Efficient tuning these readily available models is becoming a prevailing way to drastically cut training costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationViTCoD uses a learnable auto-encoder to compress sparse attentions into a much more compact representation and designs encoder and decoder engines to boost hardware utilization.
“ViTCoD [You et al., 2023] uses a learnable auto-encoder to compress the sparse attentions to a much more compact representation and designs encoder and decoder engines to boost the hardware utilization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites You et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenASICs are not easily reprogrammable or adaptable to a new task.
“However, ASICs are not easily reprogrammable or adaptable to a new task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHerrmann et al. implements optimal checkpointing for heterogeneous networks.
“More advanced methods such as [Herrmann et al., 2019] implements optimal checkpointing for heterogeneous networksfoot_2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Herrmann et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLowering the precision of computations reduces the amount of memory and computation and can be implemented in hardware-friendly fixed-point or integer representations instead of floating-point ones.
“Lowering the precision of the computations reduces the amount of memory and computation, which can be implemented in hardware-friendly fixed-point or integer representations instead of floating-point ones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningFlashAttention is becoming a default fast and memory-efficient attention module for speedup.
“which is becoming a default fast and memory-efficient attention module for speedup.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningCompared with CPUs, GPUs are more powerful at performing matrix multiplication because of their high degree of parallelism.
“compared with central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs) are more powerful to perform matrix multiplication due to the high degree of parallelism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationReparameterization-based parameter-efficient tuning tunes parameters inherently in the model or new parameters that can be reparameterized into the model, yielding no sacrifice on inference efficiency.
“To tackle this challenge, the latter proposes to tune parameters that are inherently in the model [Zaken et al., 2022] or new parameters that can be reparameterized into the model [Hu et al., 2022], thereby yielding no sacrifice on the inference efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zaken et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hu et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationZeRO-Offload offloads all fp32 model states and fp16 gradients to CPU memory, computes fp32 parameter updates on CPU, keeps fp16 parameters on GPU, and performs forward and backward computations on GPU.
“It offloads all fp32 model states and the fp16 gradients on the CPU memory, and computes the fp32 parameter updates on CPU.The fp16 parameters are kept on GPU and the forward and backward computations are on GPU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ren et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOuterSPACE transforms matrix multiplication into an outer product procedure and eliminates redundant memory accesses by decoupling multiplication from accumulation.
“OuterSPACE [Pal et al., 2018] transforms matrix multiplication into an outer product procedure and eliminates redundant memory accesses by decoupling multiplication from accumulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pal et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOuterSPACE builds a custom accelerator with a reconfigurable memory hierarchy and achieves a mean speedup of 7.9 times over a CPU running Intel Math Kernel Library and 14.0 times against a GPU running CUSP.
“OuterSPACE builds a custom accelerator with reconfigurable memory hierarchy and achieves a mean speedup of 7.9× over the CPU running Intel Math Kernel Library and 14.0× against the GPU running CUSP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStanford Alpaca is finetuned from the open-sourced LLaMA models using 52K instruction-following data generated from ChatGPT.
“which is finetuned from the open-sourced LLaMA models [Touvron et al., 2023] using the 52K instruction-following data generated from ChatGPT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Touvron et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThese large-scale training frameworks support data and model parallelism in mixed precision, along with offloading and rematerialization.
“All of these support data and model parallelism in mixed precision, along with other general practices such as offloading and rematerialization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMicrosoft DeepSpeed, HPC-AI Tech Colossal-AI and Nvidia Megatron-LM are pioneering, widely adopted prototypes for training large Transformer models at scale.
“There are several widely adopted prototypes for training large Transformer models at scale, in which Microsoft DeepSpeedfoot_5 , HPC-AI Tech Colossal-AIfoot_6 and Nvidia Megatron-LMfoot_7 are the pioneering ones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAddition-based parameter-efficient tuning methods add trainable parameters to the input space or add adapter modules to each Transformer block after the multi-head self-attention and feed-forward network.
“For example, [Lester et al., 2021;Jia et al., 2022] add trainable parameters to the input space, and [Houlsby et al., 2019] adds the adapter module twice to each Transformer block after the MSA and FFN.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lester et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jia et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Houlsby et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPopular sparse matrix computation libraries include Intel Math Kernel Library on CPU and cuSPARSE, CUSP and 2:4 structured sparsity on GPU.
“There are several popular sparse matrix computation libraries, such as Intel Math Kernel Libraryfoot_13 on CPU and cuSPARSEfoot_14 , CUSP 16 and 2:4 structured sparsityfoot_16 [Mishra et al., 2021] on GPU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mishra et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningParameter-efficient tuning updates only a small number of additional parameters while freezing the pretrained model, which significantly reduces the storage burden and scales with dynamic deployment scenarios without storing a separate model instance per case.
“As a powerful alternative for the vanilla full fine-tuning, parameterefficient tuning (PET) only updates a small number of additional parameters while freezing the pretrained model to significantly reduce the storage burden, which scales with dynamic deployment scenarios without the need to store a separate instance of model for each case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe public model zoo represented by HuggingFace, which contains pretrained models ready to be downloaded and executed, contributes significantly to reductions in training costs.
“The public model zoo represented by HuggingFace, which contains rich pretrained models that are ready to be downloaded and executed, is contributing significantly to reductions in training costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAlpaca-LoRA adopts low-rank LoRA to enable instruct-tuning LLaMA on consumer hardware, with training done within hours on a single RTX 4090.
“its variant Alpaca-LoRAfoot_4 further adopts the low-rank LoRA to enable instruct-tuning LLaMA on customer hardware, showing training can be done within hours on a single RTX 4090.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenField Programmable Gate Arrays are designed to be reprogrammed to perform different functions as needed and can serve as a prototype for ASICs before the design is finalized.
“In contrast, Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are designed to be reprogrammed to perform different functions as needed, and can also be used as a prototype for ASICs before finalizing the design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenOffloading uses external memory such as CPU memory as an extension of GPU memory to increase training memory capacity through GPU-CPU communications.
“In terms of offloading, it is a technique to use external memory such as CPU memory as an extension of GPU memory to increase memory capacity during training, through communications between GPU and CPU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMemory-efficient techniques meet the memory requirements for training large Transformers, which requires jointly optimizing processing-element utilization, memory and communication footprints across accelerators using parallelism, low-precision arithmetic, checkpointing and offloading.
“3) memory-efficient techniques to meet the memory requirements for training large Transformers, which requires jointly optimizing PE utilization, memory and communication footprints across accelerators, using parallelism, low-precision arithmetic, checkpointing and offloading strategies, etc;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt is commonly believed that at least 16 bits are necessary to train networks without impacting model accuracy.
“While it is commonly believed that at least 16-bits is necessary to train networks without impacting model accuracy [Micikevicius et al., 2018;Das et al., 2018]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Micikevicius et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Das et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeepSpeed is implemented mainly based on Rasley et al. 2020 and the ZeRO series works, Colossal-AI is built upon Bian et al. 2021, and Megatron-LM implements Narayanan et al. 2021.
“Specifically, DeepSpeed is implemented mainly based on [Rasley et al., 2020] and ZeRO series works [Rajbhandari et al., 2020;Ren et al., 2021], Colossal-AI is built upon [Bian et al., 2021], and Megatron-LM implements [Narayanan et al., 2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Rasley et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bian et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Narayanan et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSanger uses 4-bit queries and keys to compute the quantized prediction of the sparse attention matrix.
“Sanger [Lu et al., 2021] uses 4-bit queries and keys to compute the quantized prediction of sparse attention matrix.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lu et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChen et al. provides a simple periodic schedule implemented in PyTorch, but it is only optimal for homogeneous sequential networks.
“[Chen et al., 2016] provides a simple periodic schedule which was implemented in PyTorchfoot_1 , but it is only optimal for homogeneous sequential networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWith an efficient hardware accelerator, ELSA achieves a speedup of 58.1 times and three orders of magnitude improvement in energy efficiency compared to an Nvidia V100 GPU equipped with 16GB memory.
“With an efficient hardware accelerator, ELSA achieves a speedup of 58.1× as well as three orders of magnitude improvements in energy efficiency compared to an Nvidia V100 GPU equipped with 16GB memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompared with full-precision training, AMP achieves faster training and inference speed and reduces memory consumption during network training.
“Compared to full-precision training, AMP is able to achieve faster training/inference speed and reduce memory consumption during network training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Micikevicius et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLoRA approximates the update of self-attention weights into two low-rank matrices that can be merged into the pretrained weights during inference.
“the representative work LoRA [Hu et al., 2022] approximates the update of self-attention weights into two low-rank matrices, which can be merged into the pretrained weights during inference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hu et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHardware and algorithm co-design maximizes the training scalability on hardware platforms.
“4) hardware and algorithm co-design to maximize the training scalability on hardware platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningUsing lower precision multipliers, adders and memory blocks results in a significant improvement in power consumption and speedup.
“As a result, we can use lower precision multipliers, adders, and memory blocks, resulting in a significant improvement in power consumption and speedup.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Popular LLMs, such as GPT-4, Llama, and BERT, often require large memory capacity, making it challenging to run them on devices with limited memory.
“Popular LLMs, such as GPT-4, Llama, and BERT, often require large memory capacity13,58–61, making it challenging to run them on devices with limited memory, such as embedded systems, laptops, and mobile phones62.”
From Foundation metrics for evaluating effectiveness of healthcare conversations powered by generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
GPT-3 parameter count differs by a factor of ten
MinorThe introduction gives GPT-3 as having 175 billion parameters, while the memory-efficiency section gives it as having 1.75 trillion.
“GPT-3 [Brown et al., 2020] (the precursor to ChatGPT) was trained on half a trillion words and equips with 175 billion parameters.”
“from BERT [Kenton and Toutanova, 2019] 345M parameter model to GPT-3 of 1.75 trillion parameters”
Parameter-efficient tuning is described as updating both additional and existing parameters
MinorThe general description says PET only updates additional parameters while freezing the pretrained model, but the later description includes tuning parameters already in that model.
“parameterefficient tuning (PET) only updates a small number of additional parameters while freezing the pretrained model”
“the latter proposes to tune parameters that are inherently in the model [Zaken et al., 2022]”
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., et al. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,648 · see citing works
Kaugeranna, R., Kaugeranna, E., & Aion, (. S. 4. 6. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.giscience.2023.43 · Cited by 13,695 · see citing works
Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.05101 · Cited by 12,522 · see citing works
Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners
He, K., Chen, X., Xie, S., Li, Y., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01553 · Cited by 8,489 · see citing works
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602 · see citing works
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
Jouppi, N. P., Young, C., Patil, N., Patterson, D., Agrawal, G., Bajwa, R., Bates, S., Bhatia, S., Boden, N., Borchers, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/3079856.3080246 · Cited by 4,537 · see citing works
ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations
Lan, Z., Chen, M., Goodman, S., Gimpel, K., Sharma, P., & Soricut, R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11942 · Cited by 4,308 · see citing works
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684 · see citing works
Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning
Bottou, L., Curtis, F. E., & Nocedal, J. M. (2018) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/16m1080173 · Cited by 3,233 · see citing works
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243 · Cited by 3,096 · see citing works
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08691 · Cited by 3,092
Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hour
Goyal, P., Dollár, P., Girshick, R., Noordhuis, P., Wesolowski, L., Kyrola, A., Tulloch, A., Jia, Y., & He, K. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02677 · Cited by 2,294 · see citing works
Quantized Neural Networks: Training Neural Networks with Low Precision Weights and ActivationsPreprint
Hubara, I., Courbariaux, M., Soudry, D., El-Yaniv, R., & Bengio, Y. (2016) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.07061 · Cited by 2,196 · see citing works
DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradients
Zhou, S., Wu, Y., Ni, Z., Zhou, X., Wen, H., & Zou, Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06160 · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works
The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks
Frankle, J., & Carbin, M. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.03635 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformers
Bao, H., Dong, L., Piao, S., & Wei, F. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.08254 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness
Dao, T., Fu, D. Y., Ermon, S., Rudra, A., & Ré, C. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.14135 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
Micikevicius, P., Narang, S., Alben, J., Diamos, G., Elsen, E., Garcia, D., Ginsburg, B., Houston, M., Kuchaiev, O., Venkatesh, G., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.03740 · Cited by 1,179 · see citing works
Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity
Fedus, W., Zoph, B., & Shazeer, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.03961 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
Large Batch Training of Convolutional NetworksPreprint
You, Y., Gitman, I., & Ginsburg, B. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.03888 · Cited by 992 · see citing works
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.15556 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
(2020) · doi:10.1109/sc41405.2020.00024 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelism
Shoeybi, M., Patwary, M., Puri, R., LeGresley, P., Casper, J., & Catanzaro, B. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.08053 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-ParameterizationPreprint
Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., & Song, Z. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.03962 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language GenerationPreprint
Song, K., Tan, X., Qin, T., Lu, J., & Liu, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.02450 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
ConViT: improving vision transformers with soft convolutional inductive biases
d’Ascoli, S., Touvron, H., Leavitt, M. L., Morcos, A. S., Biroli, G., & Sagun, L. (2022) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac9830 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-models
Ben Zaken, E., Goldberg, Y., & Ravfogel, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.1 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivity
Lee, N., Ajanthan, T., & Torr, P. H. S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.02340 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Efficient large-scale language model training on GPU clusters using megatron-LM
Narayanan, D., Shoeybi, M., Casper, J., LeGresley, P., Patwary, M., Korthikanti, V., Vainbrand, D., Kashinkunti, P., Bernauer, J., Catanzaro, B., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis · doi:10.1145/3458817.3476209 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Cost
Chen, T., Xu, B., Zhang, C., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1604.06174 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuning
Aghajanyan, A., Gupta, S., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.568 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
MCUNet: Tiny Deep Learning on IoT DevicesPreprint
Lin, J., Chen, W.-M., Lin, Y., Cohn, J., Gan, C., & Han, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.10319 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
AutoFormer: Searching Transformers for Visual Recognition
Chen, M., Peng, H., Fu, J., & Ling, H. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01205 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithms
Chen, X., Liang, C., Huang, D., Real, E., Wang, K., Liu, Y., Pham, H., Dong, X., Luong, T., Hsieh, C.-J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.06675 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
OuterSPACE: An Outer Product Based Sparse Matrix Multiplication Accelerator
Pal, S., Beaumont, J., Park, D.-H., Amarnath, A., Feng, S., Chakrabarti, C., Kim, H.-S., Blaauw, D. T., Mudge, T., & Dreslinski, R. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca.2018.00067 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersPreprint
Evci, U., Gale, T., Menick, J., Castro, P. S., & Elsen, E. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.11134 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Drawing early-bird tickets: Towards more efficient training of deep networksPreprint
You, H.-R., Li, C.-J., Xu, P.-F., Fu, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Baraniuk, R., Wang, Z.-Y., & Lin, Y. (2019) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11957 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Smith, S., Patwary, M., Norick, B., LeGresley, P., Rajbhandari, S., Casper, J., Liu, Z., Prabhumoye, S., Zerveas, G., Korthikanti, V., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11990 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Scaling Language-Image Pre-Training via Masking
Li, Y., Fan, H., Hu, R., Feichtenhofer, C., & He, K. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02240 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Sanger: A Co-Design Framework for Enabling Sparse Attention using Reconfigurable Architecture
Lu, L., Jin, Y., Bi, H., Luo, Z., Li, P., Wang, T., & Liang, Y. E. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1145/3466752.3480125 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Mixed Precision Training of Convolutional Neural Networks using Integer OperationsPreprint
Das, D., Mellempudi, N., Mudigere, D., Kalamkar, D. D., Avancha, S., Banerjee, K., Sridharan, S., Vaidyanathan, K., Kaul, B., Georganas, E., et al. (2018) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.00930 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large DepthPreprint
Bachlechner, T. C., Majumder, B. P., Mao, H. H., Cottrell, G. W., & McAuley, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.04887 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training
Ren, J., Rajbhandari, S., Aminabadi, R. Y., Ruwase, O., Yang, S., Zhang, M., Li, D., & He, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.06840 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning
Sorscher, B., Geirhos, R., Shekhar, S., Ganguli, S., & Morcos, A. S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.14486 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
ViTCoD: Vision Transformer Acceleration via Dedicated Algorithm and Accelerator Co-Design
You, H., Sun, Z., Shi, H., Yu, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Li, B., & Lin, Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca56546.2023.10071027 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterization
Arora, S., Cohen, N., & Hazan, E. (2018) · Cited by 136 · see citing works
DOTA: detect and omit weak attentions for scalable transformer acceleration
Qu, Z., Liu, L., Tu, F., Chen, Z., Ding, Y., & Xie, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3503222.3507738 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Colossal-AI: A Unified Deep Learning System For Large-Scale Parallel Training
Li, S., Liu, H., Bian, Z., Fang, J., Huang, H., Liu, Y., Wang, B., & You, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing · doi:10.1145/3605573.3605613 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Train Big, Then Compress: Rethinking Model Size for Efficient Training and Inference of Transformers
Li, Z., Wallace, E., Shen, S., Lin, K., Keutzer, K., Klein, D., & Gonzalez, J. E. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Chasing Sparsity in Vision Transformers: An End-to-End Exploration
Chen, T., Cheng, Y., Gan, Z., Yuan, L., Zhang, L., & Wang, Z. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04533 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Accelerating Sparse Deep Neural Networks
Mishra, A., Latorre, J. A., Pool, J., Stosic, D., Stosic, D., Venkatesh, G., Yu, C., & Micikevicius, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08378 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Going deeper with Image Transformers
Cord, M. (2021) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Efficient Training of BERT by Progressively Stacking
Gong, L., He, D., Li, Z., et al. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Accelerated Optimization for Machine Learning
Lin, Z., Li, H., & Fang, C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-2910-8 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
torchgpipe: On-the-fly Pipeline Parallelism for Training Giant ModelsPreprint
Kim, C., Lee, H., Jeong, M., Baek, W., Yoon, B., Kim, I., Lim, S., & Kim, S. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.09910 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
EarlyBERT: Efficient BERT Training via Early-bird Lottery Tickets
Chen, X., Cheng, Y., Wang, S., Gan, Z., Wang, Z., & Liu, J. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.171 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationTraining Deep Models Faster with Robust, Approximate Importance Sampling
Johnson, T. B., & Guestrin, C. (2018) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Stop Wasting My Time! Saving Days of ImageNet and BERT Training with Latest Weight AveragingPreprint
Kaddour, J. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.14981 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Improving Transformer Optimization Through Better Initialization
Huang, X. S., Pérez, J. M., Ba, J. L., & Volkovs, M. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Convergence Analysis of Proximal Gradient with Momentum for Nonconvex OptimizationPreprint
Li, Q., Zhou, Y., Liang, Y., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.04925 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Why ADAM Beats SGD for Attention Models
Zhang, J., Karimireddy, S. P., Veit, A., Kim, S., Reddi, S. J., Kumar, S., & Sra, S. (2019) · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Efficient Sharpness-aware Minimization for Improved Training of Neural NetworksPreprint
Du, J., Yan, H., Feng, J., Zhou, J. T., Zhen, L., Goh, R. S. M., & Tan, V. Y. F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03141 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Automated Progressive Learning for Efficient Training of Vision Transformers
Li, C., Zhuang, B., Wang, G., Liang, X., Chang, X., & Yang, Y. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01216 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the Transformer Growth for Progressive BERT Training
Gu, X., Liu, L., Yu, H., Li, J., Chen, C., & Han, J. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.406 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Colossal-AI: A Unified Deep Learning System For Large-Scale Parallel TrainingPreprint
Li, S., Liu, H., Bian, Z., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.14883 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Herrmann, J., Beaumont, O., Eyraud‐Dubois, L., Hermann, J., Joly, A., & Shilova, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.13214 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Efficient Combination of Rematerialization and Offloading for Training DNNs
Beaumont, O., Eyraud‐Dubois, L., & Shilova, A. (2021) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Sharpness-Aware Training for FreePreprint
Du, J., Zhou, D., Feng, J., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.14083 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Mesa: A Memory-saving Training Framework for TransformersPreprint
Pan, Z., Chen, P., He, H., Liu, J., Cai, J., & Zhuang, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.11124 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationActNN: Reducing Training Memory Footprint via 2-Bit Activation Compressed TrainingPreprint
Chen, J., Zheng, L., Yao, Z., Wang, D., Stoica, I. G., Mahoney, M. W., & Gonzalez, J. E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.14129 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
GACT: Activation Compressed Training for Generic Network ArchitecturesPreprint
Liu, X., Zheng, L., Wang, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.11357 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Scaling Language-Image Pre-training via MaskingPreprint
Li, Y., Fan, H., Hu, R., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.00794 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Beaumont, O., Eyraud‐Dubois, L., Herrmann, J., et al. (2019) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805
Flagged first, then by citations
12 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Allen-Zhu et al., 2019a] Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, and Yingyu Liang. Learning and generalization in over- parameterized neural networks, going beyond two layers. In NeurIPS, 2019.
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ry- der, Melanie Subbiah, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In NeurIPS, 2020.
- Léopold Cambier, Anahita Bhiwandi- walla, et al. Shifted and squeezed 8-bit floating point for- mat for low-precision training of deep neural networks. In ICLR, 2020.
- Chen et al., 2021c] Tianlong Chen, Yu Cheng, et al. Chas- ing sparsity in vision transformers: An end-to-end explo- ration. In NeurIPS, 2021.
- Xiangning Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, et al. When vision transformers outperform resnets without pre- training or strong data augmentations. In ICLR, 2022.
- Cordonnier et al., 2020] Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier, Andreas Loukas, and Martin Jaggi. On the relationship between self-attention and convolutional layers. In ICLR, 2020.
- De and Smith, 2020] Soham De and Sam Smith. Batch normalization biases residual blocks towards the identity function in deep networks. In NeurIPS, 2020.
- Foret et al., 2021] Pierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, et al. Sharpness-aware minimization for efficiently improving generalization. In ICLR, 2021.
- Ham et al., 2020] Tae Jun Ham, Sung Jun Jung, et al. Aˆ 3: Accelerating attention mechanisms in neural networks with approximation. In HPCA, 2020.
- Ham et al., 2021] Tae Jun Ham, Yejin Lee, et al. Elsa: Hardware-software co-design for efficient, lightweight self-attention mechanism in neural networks. In ISCA, 2021.
- Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, et al. Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp. In ICML, 2019.
- Edward J Hu, yelong shen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In ICLR, 2022.
- Yanping Huang, Youlong Cheng, et al. Gpipe: Efficient training of giant neural networks using pipeline parallelism. In NeurIPS, 2019.
- Xiao Shi Huang, Felipe Perez, et al. Im- proving transformer optimization through better initializa- tion. In ICML, 2020.
- Menglin Jia, Luming Tang, Bor-Chun Chen, Claire Cardie, Serge Belongie, Bharath Hariharan, and Ser-Nam Lim. Visual prompt tuning. In ECCV, 2022.
- Katharopoulos and Fleuret, 2018] Angelos Katharopoulos and Franc ¸ois Fleuret. Not all samples are created equal: Deep learning with importance sampling. In ICML, 2018.
- Li and Liang, 2018] Yuanzhi Li and Yingyu Liang. Learn- ing overparameterized neural networks via stochastic gra- dient descent on structured data. In NeurIPS, 2018.
- Yurii Nesterov. A method for uncon- strained convex minimization problem with the rate of convergence o (1/kˆ2). In Doklady ANSSSR, volume 269, pages 543-547, 1983.
- Paul et al., 2021] Mansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, et al. Deep learning on a data diet: Finding important examples early in training. In NeurIPS, 2021.
- Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In ICML, 2021.
- Jeff Rasley, Samyam Rajbhandari, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. Deepspeed: System optimizations enable training deep learning models with over 100 billion parameters. In KDD, 2020.
- Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A Smith, and Oren Etzioni. Green ai. Communications of the ACM, 2020.
- David So, Quoc Le, and Chen Liang. The evolved transformer. In ICML, pages 5877-5886, 2019.
- Touvron et al., 2021b] Hugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, et al. Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention. In ICML, 2021.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, et al. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS, 2017.
- Wang et al., 2018] Naigang Wang, Jungwook Choi, et al. Training deep neural networks with 8-bit floating point numbers. In NeurIPS, 2018.
- Wang et al., 2020] Chaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, and Roger Grosse. Picking winning tickets before training by preserving gradient flow. In ICLR, 2020.
- Yang You, Jing Li, et al. Large batch op- timization for deep learning: Training bert in 76 minutes. In ICLR, 2019.
- Zhang and He, 2020] Minjia Zhang and Yuxiong He. Ac- celerating training of transformer-based language models with progressive layer dropping. In NeurIPS, 2020.
- Zhang et al., 2019a] Hongyi Zhang, Yann N Dauphin, and Tengyu Ma. Fixup initialization: Residual learning with- out normalization. In ICLR, 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foundation metrics for evaluating effectiveness of healthcare conversations powered by generative AI
Abbasian, M., Khatibi, E., Azimi, I., Oniani, D., Shakeri Hossein Abad, Z., Thieme, A., Sriram, R., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Lin, B., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01074-z · Cited by 213 · see citing works
A Survey on Efficient Vision Transformers: Algorithms, Techniques, and Performance Benchmarking
Papa, L., Russo, P., Amerini, I., & Zhou, L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3392941 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v4 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Mustapha, K. B. (2024) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.103066 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
On Efficient Training of Large-Scale Deep Learning Models
Shen, L., Sun, Y., Yu, Z., Ding, L., Tian, X., & Tao, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3700439 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
SleePyCo: Automatic sleep scoring with feature pyramid and contrastive learning
Lee, S., Yu, Y., Back, S., Seo, H., & Lee, K. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122551 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Zhang, E. Y., Cheok, A. D., Pan, Z., Cai, J., & Yan, Y. (2023) · Sci · doi:10.3390/sci5040046 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationE 2 VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuning
Han, C., Wang, Q., Cui, Y., Cao, Z., Wang, W., Qi, S., & Liu, D. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01604 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v3 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
A survey of transformer networks for time series forecasting
Zhao, J., Chu, F., Xie, L., Che, Y., Wu, Y., & Burke, A. F. (2025) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100883 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Khaldi, M. K., Al‐Dhaifallah, M., & Taha, O. (2023) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.066 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Towards Diverse Binary Segmentation via a Simple yet General Gated Network
Zhao, X., Pang, Y., Zhang, L., Lu, H., & Lei Zhang, A. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02058-y · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Jiang, P., Ma, Z., & Mei, G. (2026) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-26-487-2026 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
AI Computing Systems for Large Language Models Training
Zhang, Z., Wen, Y., Lyu, H.-Q., Liu, C., Zhang, R., Li, X., Wang, C., Du, Z., Guo, Q., Li, L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s11390-024-4178-1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
State-space modeling in long sequence processing: a survey on recurrence in the transformer era
Tiezzi, M., Casoni, M., Betti, A., Gori, M., & Melacci, S. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.108039 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Kristiani, E., Verma, V. K., & Chao-Tung, Y. (2026) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai7010015 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Sykas, D., Zografakis, D., & Demestichas, K. P. (2024) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire7110374 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Li, X., Xu, M., Liu, S., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3404929 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Transformer-based models for sentiment analysis of YouTube video comments
Azzouzy, O. E., Chanyour, T., & Andaloussi, S. J. (2025) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02836 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Khullar, S., Magdalene, A. H. S., Sandhya, P., Naik, B. R., N, H. K. B., & Raju, M. V. (2025) · International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) · doi:10.1109/icces67310.2025.11336350 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Wang, C., Zhan, C., Lu, B., et al. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16224202 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Which Transformer to Favor: A Comparative Analysis of Efficiency in Vision Transformers
Nauen, T., Palacio, S. M., Raue, F., & Dengel, A. (2023) · IEEE Workshop/Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00676 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Sai, B. H., Mukherjee, S., & Dubey, S. R. (2025) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-025-01686-9 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Improving End-to-End Speech Recognition for Dysarthric Speech through In-Domain Data Augmentation
Sapkota, P., Kathania, H. K., Kadiri, S. R., et al. (2024) · 2018 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf60004.2024.10942692 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Chen, D., Soto, N., Tuttle, J. F., & Zong, Z. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum · doi:10.1109/ipdpsw63119.2024.00162 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
CATS: Contrastive learning for Anomaly detection in Time Series
Ky, J. R., Mathieu, B., Lahmadi, A., & Boutaba, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825476 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kettelgerdes, M., Sarmiento, N., Erdogan, H., Wunderle, B., & Elger, G. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16132407 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
PoMQ-ViT: Mixed-Precision Quantization Vision Transformer with Pareto Optimization
Wu, Z., & Zhao, Z. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15189856 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cognitive Internet of Things: A Review of Theory, Applications, and Recent Advances
Giuliano, A., McCafferty-Leroux, A., Yawney, J., & Gadsden, S. A. (2025) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2025.3615461 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fault Diagnosis in Internal Combustion Engines Using Artificial Intelligence Predictive Models
Torres, N. N. S., Maciel, J. N., Lima, T. L. D. V., et al. (2025) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi8050147 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Velázquez-González, J. R., Pérez‐Patricio, M., Osuna-Coutiño, J. A. D. J., et al. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3509814 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
KEDformer: Knowledge extraction seasonal trend decomposition for long-term sequence prediction
Qin, Z., Wei, B., Gao, C., & Ni, J. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0335047 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
CSformer: Enhancing deep learning efficiency for intelligent IoT
Jia, X., Wu, H., Zhang, R., & Peng, M. C. (2023) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2023.11.007 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Li, X., Xu, M., Liu, S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2024.2307943 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A Comparative Survey: Reusing Small Pre-Trained Models for Efficient Large Model Training
Pandey, D., Ghebremichael, J., Qi, Z., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1109/scw63240.2024.00015 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Huo, T., He, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3554388 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Shao, H., & Wang, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2025.3561000 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hanindhito, B., Fathi, A., Gourounas, D., et al. (2025) · The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications · doi:10.1177/10943420251348799 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
An Efficient Training Architecture for Nonlinear Softmax Function in Transformers
Shao, H., & Wang, Z. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11044130 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Anomaly detection in urban lighting systems using autoencoder and transformer algorithms
Śmiałkowski, T., & Czyżewski, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19414-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Transformer-Based Models for Sentiment Analysis of Youtube Video CommentsPreprint
Azzouzy, O. E., Chanyour, T., & Andaloussi, S. J. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5071111 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AWNet: Negative Obstacle Semantic Segmentation Network Based on Adaptive Weight Loss
Zhao, J., Yu, G., Wang, J., et al. (2024) · 2022 IEEE 20th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) · doi:10.1109/indin58382.2024.10774235 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Challenges and Emerging Issues for Generative AI and Hyper Intelligence
Ma, J.-H., Jin, Q., Hsu, H.-H., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Cyber Science and Technology Congress (CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/cyberscitech64112.2024.00048
Singh, M., & Singla, S. K. (2025) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2025.060863 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
An Efficient Layer Normalization Training Module With Dynamic Quantization for Transformers
Shao, H., Wang, A., & Wang, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2025.3591633 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Survey on Accelerated Technologies for Mixture-of-Experts Model Training Systems
Zhang, Q., Zhai, J., & Zheng, W. (2025) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2025.9010169 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Intelligent Sustainability: Evaluating Transformers for Cryptocurrency Environmental Claims
Bouzari, P., Fekete‐Farkas, M., & Szalay, Z. G. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16121022 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Garnet: integrating random walk encoding and graph rewiring for routing optimization
Khriss, A., Elmiad, A. K., Badaoui, M., Mzili, T., & Alkhazaleh, H. A. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11544-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Explainable Deep Learning Techniques for Colon Cancer Diagnosis Using Histopathological Images
Purushotham, N., & Avanija, J. (2026) · Contemporary Computing Innovations Conference (CCIC) · doi:10.1109/ccic68129.2026.11486104 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Resgru: Syndrome decoder for heavy-hexagon quantum error correction code
Kumar, A., Haghparast, M., & Kettunen, L. (2026) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae87e2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Similarity-Based Intent Detection Using an Enhanced Siamese Network
Muhammad, Y. I., Salim, N. B., Muchtar, F., et al. (2025) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.127 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
FaLA: Fast Linear Adaptation for Replacing Backbone Models on Edge Devices
Huang, S., Qu, L., Yuan, X., & Chen, C. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.323
A Sparse Sinkhorn Transformer for Multi-Behaviour Recommendation
Mukande, T., Ali, E., Caputo, A., Dong, R., & O'Connor, N. E. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE) · doi:10.1109/icebe59045.2023.00019
Gassmann, L., & Campbell, J. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62273-1_13
(2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-27318-6.00018-8
Hash-Based Food Image Retrieval with Enhanced Feature Correlation Vision Transformeraper
Yuan, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, F. (2024) · International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI) · doi:10.1109/cisp-bmei64163.2024.10906165
Tang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, C., et al. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129910
Building Green Generative AI: An Ecosystem-Wide Approach to Environmental Sustainability
Helms, F., Hönemann, K., & Wiesche, M. (2025) · Bled eConference · doi:10.18690/um.fov.4.2025.38
Rodriguez, D. A., Sanderson, D., Garcia‐Blas, J., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90200-0_31
Research on efficient inference of large language model based on routing policy
Shan, P., Wei, X., Zhang, Y., & Liu, D. (2025) · International Conference on Communications, Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE) · doi:10.1109/cisce65916.2025.11065479
An Efficient Attention Mechanism for Sequential Recommendation Tasks: HydraRec
Mushtaque, U. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92602-0_19
TransScan - Scanning Latin Dactylic Verse Using Transformers
Wang, Y., & Steven, X. (2025) · doi:10.1109/isbdas64762.2025.11116809
Enhancing Masked Language Modeling in BERT Models Using Pretrained Static Embeddings
Mištera, A., & Král, P. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02551-7_19
Alav, S., Daş, B., & Benli, K. S. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) · doi:10.1109/ubmk67458.2025.11207074
Contrastive learning with multi-scale temporal modeling for robust music performance analysis
Zhang, S., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2025.105839
A didactic overview of Transformer applications: model variations and user guidelines
Cabrera-Bermejo, M. I., Germán, M., de la Rosa, D., Jesus, M. D., Rivera, A., Elizondo, D. A., Charte, F., & Godoy, P. (2025) · Logic Journal of IGPL · doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzaf040
Enhancing progressive ensemble learning via normalized extra-Gradient initialization
Wu, Z., Pan, Y. R., Zeng, D., et al. (2026) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2026.108733
Self-citationFed-Grow: Federating to Grow Transformers for Resource-Constrained Users Without Model Sharing
Shen, S., Zou, Y., Yuan, Y., Gu, H., Li, P., Cheng, X., Dressler, F., & Yu, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2026.3666309
Basic Theory of Autonomous Driving
Huang, Y., & Yang, Z. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3725-9_2
APSDA: Adversarially Pruned Sparse Dynamic Attention for Robust Handwritten Text Recognition
Xiang, Y., Xian, Y., Shen, T., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp55912.2026.11463221
Interpretable Transformer-Based Model Management for Recommender Systems
Kumar, N. H., Ramesh, P., Velankanni, T. R., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/rcsm67767.2025.11507812
Xin, J.-J., Li, X., Kilper, D., & Huang, S.-G. (2026) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2026.3704665
STP-Based Transformers: Enabling Padding-Free Processing and Mixed-Head Attention
Liu, Y., & Zhou, R. (2026) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc69976.2026.11560299
Lai, X., Deng, S., Yu, L., Lai, Y., Qiao, S., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2026.105047
What is Attention Mechanism? A Comprehensive Survey of Attention Methods and Transformer Models
Shiri, F. M., Memar, F., & Parhizgar, M. (2026) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-026-07131-w
- Authors
- Zhuang, B., Liu, J., Pan, Z., He, H., Weng, Y., & Shen, C.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2023-08
- Pages
- 6823-6831
- OpenAlex
- W4385764034
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- training acceleration, hardware acceleration, memory efficiency, computation cost reduction, hardware-software co-design, large language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review