Cited by 24Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditionsAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Nasal Airway Volume and Resistance to Airflow

Zhang, Gehua, Solomon, Philip, Rival, Richard, Fenton, Ronald S., Cole, Philip·2008·American Journal of Rhinology

Abstract

Background In modern rhinological practice and research, rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry are widely used. The goal of this study was to determine whether there is correlation between rhinomanometrically derived nasal airflow resistances and acoustic rhinometrically derived nasal airway volumes. Methods To achieve the goal, a prospective cross-sectional study of a total of 316 patients complaining of nasal obstruction was performed. Resulting data were compared by means of Spearman rank correlations of the total number of patients and of subgroups. Results The total number of patients, and most subgroups, in both their untreated and decongested states showed significant negative correlation unilaterally between nasal airflow resistances and nasal volumes. Conclusion Rhinomanometric nasal airflow resistances and concurrent acoustic rhinometric nasal airway volumes are closely correlated. The combination of the two objective methods provides insight into nasal airflow physiology and nasal airway anatomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3187

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, G., Solomon, P., Rival, R., Fenton, R. S., & Cole, P.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Rhinology
Published
2008-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
371-375
ISSN
  • 1050-6586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-6290
OpenAlex
W2077349665
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Rhinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
nasal airway volume, nasal resistance, rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, nasal obstruction, nasal decongestion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Airway Resistance, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Nasal Obstruction, Rhinometry, Acoustic, Rhinomanometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review