Cited by 12Mental Health Treatment and AccessInclusion and Disability in Education and SportPsychology and Mental Health

Attitudes towards people with mental illness among medical students: A qualitative research

Open access
Rodríguez-Rivas, Matías E.·2021·Psychology, Society & Education

Abstract

Psychiatric illnesses affect more than 450 million people worldwide, with several consequences for those who are affected, along with the presence of high numbers of discrimination, stigmatization, and negative attitudes of the general population. These negative attitudes have been observed even in health professionals, negatively impacting on the quality of care, adherence to treatment and well-being of affected users. This study describes attitudes of medical students towards people with psychiatric illness from a qualitative perspective, through the analysis of thematic content of 12 semi-structured interviews conducted with first- to fourth-year medical students. Among the results, a diversity of identified attitudes outstands, including empathy, frustration, indifference and rejection, uncertainty and fear, tolerance and social acceptance. As a discussion, it is stated that most of the findings were consistent with the international literature, however there are new findings that are not described, highlighting the attitude of fear of being harmed and the rejection towards people with psychiatric pathologies. The design and implementation of educative interventions that facilitate contact with users, in order to reduce stigma and negative attitudes in future medical professionals, is concluded as an urgent challenge. Finally, it is proposed for future research to develop longitudinal and comparative studies that consider measuring the effectiveness of these interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25115/psye.v13i2.3663

Cites

50 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez-Rivas, M. E.
Venue
Psychology, Society & Education
Published
2021-09-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
21-33
ISSN
  • 1989-709X (ISSN-L)
  • 2171-2085
OpenAlex
W3168381450
Cited by
12
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Psychology Society & Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
attitudes toward mental illness, medical students, mental health stigma, stigma reduction, empathy, fear of harm, rejection, medical education, clinician attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review