New state transition matrices for spacecraft relative motion in perturbed orbits
Abstract
This paper presents new state transition matrices that model the relative motion of two spacecraft in arbitrarily eccentric orbits perturbed by and differential drag for three state definitions based on relative orbital elements. Both density-model-specific and density-model-free formulations of the effects of differential drag are included. The state transition matrices are derived by first performing a Taylor expansion on the equations of relative motion and subsequently computing an exact closed-form solution of the resulting linear differential equations. The resulting state transition matrices are used to generalize the geometric interpretation of the effects of and differential drag on relative motion in near-circular orbits provided in previous works to arbitrarily eccentric orbits. Additionally, this paper harmonizes current literature by demonstrating that a number of state transition matrices derived by previous authors using various techniques can be found by subjecting the models presented in this paper to more restrictive assumptions. Finally, the presented state transition matrices are validated through comparison with a high-fidelity numerical orbit propagator. It is found that these models are able to match or exceed the accuracy of comparable models in the literature over a broad range of orbit scenarios.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perturbation models can be easily accommodated in filter dynamics when using Relative Orbital Elements.
“Notably, perturbation models can be easily accommodated in the filter dynamics in the latter case [58,59,60].”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results
Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Watkins, M., & Reigber, C. (2004) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2004gl019920 · Cited by 3,024 · see citing works
Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous
Clohessy, W. H., & Wiltshire, R. (1960) · Journal of the aerospace sciences/Journal of the aero/space sciences · doi:10.2514/8.8704 · Cited by 2,093 · see citing works
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
(2021) · doi:10.2514/jgcd · Cited by 2,008 · see citing works
TanDEM-X: A Satellite Formation for High-Resolution SAR Interferometry
Krieger, G., Moreira, A., Fiedler, H., Hajnsek, I., Werner, M. U., Younis, M., & Zink, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2007.900693 · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works
Analytical Mechanics Of Space Systems
Schaub, H., & Junkins, J. L. (2003) · American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics eBooks · doi:10.2514/4.861550 · Cited by 1,580 · see citing works
Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives
Burch, J. L., Moore, T. E., Torbert, R. B., et al. (2015) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0164-9 · Cited by 1,526 · see citing works
Advances in astronautical sciences
Shepherd, L. (1963) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/0032-0633(63)90131-4 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
Solution of the problem of artificial satellite theory without drag
Brouwer, D. (1959) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/107958 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Montenbruck, O., & Gill, E. K. A. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58351-3 · Cited by 795 · see citing works
New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit
Yamanaka, K., & Ankersen, F. (2002) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/2.4875 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
State Transition Matrix of Relative Motion for the Perturbed Noncircular Reference Orbit
Gim, D.-W., & Alfriend, K. T. (2003) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/2.6924 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
High-Fidelity Linearized J Model for Satellite Formation Flight
Schweighart, S. A., & Sedwick, R. J. (2002) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/2.4986 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
D’Amico, S., & Montenbruck, O. (2006) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.15114 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Self-citationSpaceborne Autonomous Formation-Flying Experiment on the PRISMA Mission
D'Amico, S., Ardaens, J.-S., & Larsson, R. (2012) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.55638 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationHistory of Space Shuttle Rendezvous and Proximity Operations
Goodman, J. L. (2006) · Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · doi:10.2514/1.19653 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Autonomous Formation Flying in Low Earth Orbit
D’Amico, S. (2010) · elib (German Aerospace Center) · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationE/I-vector separation for safe switching of the GRACE formation
Montenbruck, O., Kirschner, M., D’Amico, S., & Bettadpur, S. V. (2006) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2006.04.001 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationGauss's Variational Equation-Based Dynamics and Control for Formation Flying Spacecraft
Breger, L. S., & How, J. P. (2007) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.22649 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
PROBA-3: Precise formation flying demonstration mission
Llorente, S., Agenjo, A., Carrascosa, C., de Negueruela, C., Mestreau-Garreau, A., Cropp, A., & Santovincenzo, A. (2012) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.05.029 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Satellite Relative Motion Using Differential Equinoctial Elements
Gim, D.-W., & Alfriend, K. T. (2005) · Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s10569-004-1799-0 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Model of $$J_2$$ J 2 perturbed satellite relative motion with time-varying differential drag
Gaias, G. V. M., Ardaens, J.-S., & Montenbruck, O. (2015) · Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s10569-015-9643-2 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Navigation and control of the TanDEM-X formation
Montenbruck, O., Kahle, R., D’Amico, S., et al. (2008) · The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf03256557 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationFormation Establishment and Reconfiguration Using Differential Elements inJ2-Perturbed Orbits
Roscoe, C. W. T., Westphal, J. J., Griesbach, J. D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.g000999 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Generalised multi-impulsive manoeuvres for optimum spacecraft rendezvous in near-circular orbit
Gaias, G. V. M., D’Amico, S., Amico, N. A., & Ardaens, J.-S. (2015) · International Journal of Space Science and Engineering · doi:10.1504/ijspacese.2015.069361 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationGPS-based relative navigation for the Proba-3 formation flying mission
Ardaens, J.-S., D’Amico, S., & Cropp, A. (2013) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.06.025 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative analysis of Cartesian and curvilinear Clohessy-Wiltshire equations
deBruijn, F., Gill, E. K. A., & How, J. P. (2011) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering Sciences and Applications · doi:10.7446/jaesa.0302.01 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Chamberlin, J. A., & Rose, J. T. (1964) · Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · doi:10.2514/3.27585 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Line-of-sight guidance techniques for manned orbital rendezvous
Aldrin, B. (1963) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Optimal Formation Design for Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission Using Differential Orbital Elements
Roscoe, C. W. T., Vadali, S. R., Alfriend, K. T., et al. (2011) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.52484 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A smooth and robust Harris-Priester atmospheric density model for low Earth orbit applications
Hatten, N., & Russell, R. P. (2016) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2016.10.015 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pasqualetto Cassinis, L., Fonod, R., & Gill, E. (2019) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.008 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Park, T. H., & D’Amico, S. (2023) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.g007387 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural-aided GNC reconfiguration algorithm for distributed space system: development and PIL test
Silvestrini, S., & Lavagna, M. (2021) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2020.12.014 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Koenig, A. W., Guffanti, T., & D’Amico, S.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- Venue
- Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1749-1768
- ISSN
- 0731-5090 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-3884
- OpenAlex
- W2595023674
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AP70H)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Keywords
- state transition matrix, spacecraft relative motion, differential drag, atmospheric drag, orbital perturbations, eccentric orbits, relative orbital elements, Taylor series expansion, analytical solution, density model, quasi-circular orbits, orbit propagation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
