Cited by 26Planetary Science and ExplorationSpacecraft Design and TechnologySpacecraft Dynamics and Control

Lunar South Pole Illumination: Review, Reassessment, and Power System Implications

Fincannon, James·2007·5th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC)

Abstract

This paper reviews past analyses and research related to lunar south pole illumination and presents results of independent illumination analyses using an analytical tool and a radar digital elevation model. The analysis tool enables assessment at most locations near the lunar poles for any time and any year. Average illumination fraction, energy storage duration, solar/horizon terrain elevation profiles and illumination fraction profiles are presented for various highly illuminated sites which have been identified for manned or unmanned operations. The format of the data can be used by power system designers to develop mass optimized solar and energy storage systems. Data are presented for the worse case lunar day (a critical power planning bottleneck) as well as three lunar days during lunar south pole winter. The main site under consideration by present lunar mission planners (on the Crater Shackleton rim) is shown to have, for the worse case lunar day, a 0.71 average illumination fraction and 73 to 117 hours required for energy storage (depending on power system type). Linking other sites and including towers at either site are shown to not completely eliminate the need for energy storage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2007-4700

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High terrain and low solar elevation angle near the lunar polar regions create long shadows and obstruct solar energy availability.

    “Besides, although the average illumination gives an approximation of the solar availability, the high terrain and low solar elevation angle near the lunar polar regions create long shadows [21], [26] and obstruct the solar energy availability.”
  • Low solar elevation angles and high terrain in lunar polar regions create long shadows in the range of kilometers, affecting solar illumination on polar sites.

    “The low solar elevation angles in the lunar polar regions and the high terrain create long shadows (in the range of kilometers) [21], [26], affecting the solar illumination on the polar sites.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fincannon, J.
Affiliations
Glenn Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Fincannon, James
Venue
5th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC)
Published
2007-06-18
OpenAlex
W1999781678
Cited by
26
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIAA International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC) (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
  • NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Keywords
lunar power systems, Shackleton crater, lunar day, solar energy, lunar base, power system design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review