Cited by 133Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry

Improved LOLA elevation maps for south pole landing sites: Error estimates and their impact on illumination conditions

Open access
Barker, Michael K., Mazarico, Erwan, Neumann, Gregory A., Smith, David E., Zuber, Maria T., Head, James W.·2021·Planetary and Space Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pss.2020.105119

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, M. K., Mazarico, E., Neumann, G. A., Smith, D. E., Zuber, M. T., & Head, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Barker, Michael K.
Venue
Planetary and Space Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
203
Pages
105119
ISSN
0032-0633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092695736
Cited by
133
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Planetary and Space Science (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NASA
  • HEC
  • NASA Center for Climate Simulation
  • Goddard Space Flight Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Keywords
Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter, lunar south pole, landing site selection, digital elevation model, laser altimetry, lighting conditions, lunar topography, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review