Cited by 32Planetary Science and ExplorationChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesSpace Exploration and Technology

Demonstrating the Solar Carbothermal Reduction of Lunar Regolith to Produce Oxygen

Gustafson, Robert, White, Brant, Fidler, Michael, Muscatello, Anthony·2010·48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2010-1163

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subsequent experiments with 550-600 W of power resulted in maximum melt masses of 33 g and oxygen yields of 2.6 wt%, highlighting the crucial role of power levels in optimizing the oxygen extraction process.

    “Subsequent experiments with 550-600 W of power resulted in maximum melt masses of 33 g and oxygen yields of 2.6 wt%, highlighting the crucial role of power levels in optimizing the oxygen extraction process.”
  • In one test, conducted for 80 min with approximately 700 W of solar power, the processed simulant produced a melt with a diameter of 53.3 mm and a mass of 77.6 g, achieving an oxygen yield of 11.3 wt%.

    “In one test, conducted for 80 min with approximately 700 W of solar power, the processed simulant produced a melt with a diameter of 53.3 mm and a mass of 77.6 g, achieving an oxygen yield of 11.3 wt%.”
  • Through extensive carbothermal reduction experiments utilizing direct energy heating, ORBITEC achieved oxygen yields up to 28 wt%.

    “Through extensive carbothermal reduction experiments utilizing direct energy heating, ORBITEC achieved oxygen yields up to 28 wt%.”
  • The 2010 field demonstration achieved an oxygen extraction rate of 1.45 g per kilowatt-hour (g/KWh) delivered to the reactor.

    “The 2010 field demonstration [88,90] achieved an oxygen extraction rate of 1.45 g per kilowatt-hour (g/KWh) delivered to the reactor.”
  • The regolith samples processed had very low carbon content, ranging from 0 to 0.03 wt%, corresponding to a maximum carbon loss of only 1.7 kg per metric ton of oxygen produced.

    “Despite this challenge, the regolith samples processed had very low carbon content, ranging from 0 to 0.03 wt%, corresponding to a maximum carbon loss of only 1.7 kg per metric ton of oxygen produced.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 32

Authors
Gustafson, R., White, B., Fidler, M., & Muscatello, A.
Affiliations
  • ORBITEC
  • Kennedy Space Center (US)
Venue
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
Published
2010-01-04
OpenAlex
W1995216758
Cited by
32
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kennedy Space Center
  • Johnson Space Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
lunar regolith, oxygen production, in-situ resource utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review