Cited by 39Space Satellite Systems and ControlSpacecraft Dynamics and ControlAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Robust Features Extraction for On-board Monocular-based Spacecraft Pose Acquisition

Capuano, Vincenzo, Alimo, Shahrouz Ryan, Ho, Andrew Q., Chung, Soon-Jo·2019·AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum

Abstract

This paper presents the design, implementation, and validation of a robust feature extraction architecture for real-time on-board monocular vision-based pose initialization of a target spacecraft in application to on-orbit servicing and formation flying. The proposed computer vision algorithm is designed to detect the most significant features of an uncooperative target spacecraft in a sequence of two-dimensional input images that are collected on board the chaser spacecraft. A novel approach based on the fusion of multiple and parallel processing streams is proposed to filter a minimum number of extracted true point features, even in case of unfavourable illumination conditions and in presence of Earth in the background. These are then combined into relevant polyline structures that characterize the true geometrical shape of the target spacecraft.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2019-2005

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of the Fast-Hessian feature detector with the BRISK descriptor has comparable performance in both VIS and TIR spectra, making it a promising option when reduced memory usage is a key requirement.

    “the combination of the Fast-Hessian feature detector with the Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints (BRISK) descriptor proved to have comparable performance in both spectra, resulting in a promising option when reduced memory usage repre-295 sent a key requirement.”
  • L2 or L1 loss does not represent correctly the actual angular distance for any orientation representation.

    “While several works [13, 16, 24] have used L 2 or L 1 loss to regress orientation. This does not represent correctly the actual angular distance for any orientation representation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capuano, V., Alimo, S. R., Ho, A. Q., & Chung, S.-J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Venue
AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum
Published
2019-01-06
OpenAlex
W2910148174
Cited by
39
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIAA SciTech Forum (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
spacecraft pose estimation, monocular vision, on-board processing, feature extraction, on-orbit servicing, formation flying, lighting conditions, real-time vision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review