Cited by 7Space Satellite Systems and ControlAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Investigating vision transformers for bridging domain gap in satellite pose estimation

Lotti, Alessandro, Modenini, Dario, Tortora, Paolo·2023·Studies in Computational Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-25755-1_20

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lotti, A., Modenini, D., & Tortora, P.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Lotti, Alessandro
Venue
Studies in Computational Intelligence
Published
2023
Pages
299-314
ISSN
  • 1860-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-9503
OpenAlex
W4380899229
Cited by
7
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in computational intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
satellite pose estimation, vision transformer, Swin Transformer, domain gap, domain shift, adversarial domain adaptation, lightweight neural networks, data augmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review