Cited by 128Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain

Fritz, Julie M., Beneciuk, Jason M., George, Steven Z.·2011·Physical Therapy

Abstract

Background The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) was recently developed for primary care providers to use as a screening tool for subgrouping people with low back pain (LBP) on the basis of modifiable prognostic factors. The use of the SBT in physical therapy has not been described. Objective The aims of this study were to describe the use of the SBT in people receiving physical therapy for LBP and to describe patterns of change in clinical outcomes across the episode of care and among SBT categories. Design This study was a prospective case series. Methods A total of 214 patients receiving physical therapy for LBP were administered the SBT at the initial evaluation. Treatment was at the physical therapist's discretion. Clinical outcomes included pain intensity and disability scores collected at each session. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and baseline characteristics among SBT categories were compared. Hierarchical linear mixed models were used to examine patterns of change in predicted outcomes across the episode of care. Results The patients' mean age was 44.3 years (SD=15.8), and 56.5% were women. The SBT categorized 33.2% of the patients as being at low risk, 47.7% as being at medium risk, and 19.2% as being at high risk. The high-risk category corresponded to the highest initial pain intensity and disability scores. The low-risk category corresponded to the lowest initial pain intensity and disability scores. Linear mixed models indicated different patterns of ch…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2522/ptj.20100109

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The items used for impact stratification (pain intensity, pain interference, and functional status) have substantial research support for their discriminatory and prognostic importance.

    “These items have substantial research support to validate their discriminatory and prognostic importance. 13, 19, 31, 38, 39, 43, 47–49, 53, 54, 57–60, 66–68, 73, 76, 80, 82, 85, 86, 97, 106, 108, 110, 112–116, 122”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fritz, J. M., Beneciuk, J. M., & George, S. Z.
Affiliations
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Fritz, Julie M.
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
722-732
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W2160741250
Cited by
128
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
STarT Back Screening Tool, low back pain, pain intensity, disability, treatment outcomes, risk stratification, primary care screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Utah, Chi-Square Distribution, Linear Models, Treatment Outcome, Episode of Care, Low Back Pain, Risk Assessment, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review