Cited by 18AI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Artificial intelligence: its role in dermatopathology

Open access
Jartarkar, Shishira R.·2022·Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), a major frontier in the field of medical research, can potentially lead to a paradigm shift in clinical practice. A type of artificial intelligence system known as convolutional neural network points to the possible utility of deep learning in dermatopathology. Though pathology has been traditionally restricted to microscopes and glass slides, recent advancement in digital pathological imaging has led to a transition making it a potential branch for the implementation of artificial intelligence. The current application of artificial intelligence in dermatopathology is to complement the diagnosis and requires a well-trained dermatopathologist's guidance for better designing and development of deep learning algorithms. Here we review the recent advances of artificial intelligence in dermatopathology, its applications in disease diagnosis and in research, along with its limitations and future potential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25259/ijdvl_725_2021

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Jartarkar review points out how AI models can be used to solve tasks like HER2 expression assessment which are regularly marred by human errors and the need for teamwork and interdisciplinary training.

    “The review of Jartarkar (17) further builds on this by pointing out how AI models can be used to solve tasks like HER2 expression assessment which are regularly marred by human errors and the need for teamwork and interdisciplinary training.”

    From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Introduction says AI can assist with HER2 expression evaluation, a task prone to human error. Its Limitations section calls for interdisciplinary participation to build effective AI algorithms, and the Introduction discusses AI education and training. It does not say that HER2 assessment itself is hampered by a need for teamwork or interdisciplinary training. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If dermoscopy datasets are employed for training AI models, they can enable diagnostic systems that may be as good as or even better than human diagnosis in certain contexts.

    “If the same is employed for training AI models, then these datasets can enable the formation of the basis of diagnostic systems that may be as good or even better than human diagnosis in certain contexts (17).”
  • The comparative review outlines technical challenges, such as mislabeling and intra- and inter-class variations, that hinder broader application of AI models.

    “The comparative review also outlines technical challenges, such as mislabeling and intra- and inter-class variations, that hinder the broader application of AI models.”
  • This finding aligns with the results of this scoping review, which showed that CNNs performed well on the chosen datasets.

    “This finding aligns with the results of this scoping review, which showed that CNNs performed well on the chosen datasets.”
  • The Jartarkar review reported rates of 99.3% for dermal nevus, 99.5% for nodular basal cell carcinoma, and 100% for seborrheic keratosis.

    “For example, the review by Jartarkar (17), with rates of 99.3% for dermal nevus, 99.5% for nodular basal cell carcinoma, and 100% for seborrheic keratosis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jartarkar, S. R.
Corresponding author
Jartarkar, Shishira R.
Venue
Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology
Published
2022-12-13
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
549-552
ISSN
  • 0378-6323 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-3922
OpenAlex
W4311364437
Cited by
18
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
artificial intelligence, dermatopathology, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, digital pathology, computer-aided diagnosis, AI limitations
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Forecasting, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review