Cited by 198Pharmacological Effects and AssaysAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMeat and Animal Product Quality

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effect of various levels of ractopamine hydrochloride on the performance and carcass characteristics of finishing swine.

Watkins, L E, Jones, D J, Mowrey, D H, Anderson, D B, Veenhuizen, E L·1990·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Six trials involving 888 pigs (Study 1) and three trials involving 360 pigs (Study 2) were conducted at various geographical locations in the U.S. and Canada to evaluate the effect of ractopamine hydrochloride on the performance and carcass characteristics of finishing swine. All trials were conducted using a randomized complete block design. Trial data were pooled within study for statistical analysis. Pigs averaged approximately 64.5 kg (Study 1) and 65.9 kg (Study 2) initially and had ad libitum access to a 16% crude protein corn-soybean meal or barley-soybean meal diet. Ractopamine was included in the diet at 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 or 30 ppm (Study 1), or at 0, 5, 10, 15 or 20 ppm (Study 2); diets were fed for an average of 45 d (Study 1) and 50 d (Study 2) to a final weight of about 104.3 kg (Study 1) and 106.6 kg (Study 2). Carcass dissection data were collected in three of the six trials in Study 1 (0, 5 and 20 ppm ractopamine) and in all three trials in Study 2 (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 ppm ractopamine). All ractopamine levels improved (P less than .05) ADG and feed: gain (Studies 1 and 2) above those of control pigs. Ractopamine levels of 10 to 30 ppm (Studies 1 and 2) improved (P less than .05) dressing percentage over controls. Pigs fed ractopamine at 5 and 20 ppm (Study 1) and 10, 15 and 20 ppm (Study 2) had increased (P less than .05) dissected leanness compared with controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/1990.68113588x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–198 of 198

Metadata

Authors
Watkins, L. E., Jones, D. J., Mowrey, D. H., Anderson, D. B., & Veenhuizen, E. L.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1990
Volume
68
Issue
11
Pages
3588
ISSN
0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W191217324
Cited by
198
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
ractopamine hydrochloride, fattening pigs, growth performance, carcass characteristics, average daily gain, feed efficiency, carcass yield, carcass leanness, feed additive dosage, corn-soybean meal diet
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Animals, Eating, Female, Growth Substances, Male, Muscles, Phenethylamines, Swine, Weight Gain, Muscle Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review