The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of the effects of phytoestrogens on sheep and cattle
Abstract
Cows and ewes fed estrogenic forage may suffer impaired ovarian function, often accompanied by reduced conception rates and increased embryonic loss. Males are relatively unaffected, but the mammary glands in females and castrate males may undergo hypertrophy of the duct epithelium, accompanied by secretion of clear or milky fluid. In cows, clinical signs resemble those associated with cystic ovaries. The infertility is temporary, normally resolving within 1 mo after removal from the estrogenic feed. However, ewes exposed to estrogen for prolonged periods may suffer a second form of infertility that is permanent, caused by developmental actions of estrogen during adult life. The cervix becomes defeminized and loses its ability to store spermatozoa, so conception rates are reduced, although ovarian function remains normal. Importantly, both temporary and permanent infertility in ewes often occur without observable signs and can be detected only by measurement of phytoestrogens in the diet, or measurement of their effects on the animal. Low background concentrations of dietary phytoestrogens are suggested to play an important role in prevention of disease in humans and laboratory rats, but subclinical effects of phytoestrogens in cattle have not yet been described. Effects of low concentrations of phytoestrogens on reproductive function in ruminants are likely to receive increasing attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A SPECIFIC BREEDING PROBLEM OF SHEEP ON SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER PASTURES IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Bennetts, H. W., Uuderwood, E. J., & Shier, F. L. (1946) · Australian Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1946.tb15473.x · Cited by 664
Adlercreutz, H., Honjo, H., Higashi, A., Fotsis, T., Hämäläinen, E., Hasegawa, T., & Okada, H. (1991) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/54.6.1093 · Cited by 656
Folman, Y., & Pope, G. S. (1966) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe.0.0340215 · Cited by 135
Lundh, T., Pettersson, H., & Martinsson, K. A. (1990) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf00097a022 · Cited by 85
Permanent infertility in ewes exposed to plant oestrogens
Adams, N. (1990) · Australian Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1990.tb07758.x · Cited by 65
Self-citationPlant oestrogens; the cause of decreased fertility in cows. A case report.
Kallela, K., Heinonen, K., & Saloniemi, H. S. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 62
Cited by
The pros and cons of phytoestrogens
Patisaul, H. B., & Jefferson, W. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.03.003 · Cited by 746
Consequences of plant phenolic compounds for productivity and health of ruminants
Waghorn, G. C., & McNabb, W. C. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2003245 · Cited by 313
Forage Legumes for Grazing and Conserving in Ruminant Production Systems
Phelan, P., Moloney, A. P., McGeough, E. J., Humphreys, J., Bertilsson, J., O’Riordan, E. G., & O’Kiely, P. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2014.898455 · Cited by 212
Patisaul, H. B., Whitten, P. L., & Young, L. J. (1999) · Molecular Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0169-328x(99)00058-3 · Cited by 164
Luczak, E. D., & Leinwand, L. A. (2009) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163156 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, N. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-05-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1509-1515
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1595294120
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of the effects of phytoestrogens on sheep and cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1995.7351509x
- The paper
- Adams, N. R. (1995). Detection of the effects of phytoestrogens on sheep and cattle. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7351509x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.