The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of alfalfa root saponins on digestive function in sheep.
Abstract
The effects of alfalfa saponins on ruminal pH and VFA concentrations, protozoal numbers, forestomach motility, and digesta flow from the rumen were examined in this experiment. In a preliminary study, either 800 or 1600 mg/kg of saponins per kg BW were administered intraruminally in a single dose to one of two 60-kg wethers. Ruminal contractions were suppressed within 15 min. The study was terminated when one wether didn't recover. Saponins were then administered intraruminally in two equal doses daily into four ruminally and duodenally cannulated wethers (60 +/- 1 kg) in amounts equivalent to 0, 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg BW daily in a 4 x 4 Latin Square arrangement. Saponins increased VFA concentrations (P = .001) and lowered ruminal pH (P = .001) after 2 d of administration. On d 2 and d 14, saponins decreased (P < .01) protozoal populations. On d 11, pressure changes during ruminal contractions increased by 79% during resting (P = .06), 202% during feeding (P = .05), and 53% during an 8-h period (P = .08) as the level of saponins increased from 0 to 800 mg/kg BW. Administered saponins increased duodenal flows of OM and total N by 19 and 26%, respectively (P = .04 and .01). Apparent total tract N digestibility was reduced (P = .02) by 5% at the highest saponin dosage. We conclude that alfalfa may contain enough saponins to adversely impact ruminoreticular motility. Saponins also caused decreased ruminal protozoal populations, increased flow of total duodenal N, and reduced ruminal and total tract apparent digestibilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A new perspective on the use of plant secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen
Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2010) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.05.010 · Cited by 579
Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites
Bodas, R., Prieto, N., García-González, R., Andrés, S., Giráldez, F. J., & López, S. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.010 · Cited by 437
Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2009) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422409990163 · Cited by 320
Potential Therapeutic Applications of Some Antinutritional Plant Secondary Metabolites
Singh, B., Bhat, T. K., & Singh, B. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf021150r · Cited by 277
Patra, A. K. (2012) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2090-y · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Klita, P. T., Mathison, G. W., Fenton, T. W., & Hardin, R. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1144
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W122375731
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of alfalfa root saponins on digestive function in sheep. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1996.7451144x
- The paper
- Klita, P. T., Mathison, G. W., Fenton, T. W., & Hardin, R. T. (1996). Effects of alfalfa root saponins on digestive function in sheep. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.7451144x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.