The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production
Open accessAbstract
The growing public concerns over chemical residues in animal-derived foods and threats of antibiotic-resistant bacteria have renewed interest in exploring safer alternatives to chemical feed additives in ruminant livestock. Various bioactive phytochemicals including saponins appear to be potential ‘natural’ alternatives to ‘chemical’ additives in modulating rumen fermentation favourably and animal performance. Saponins are a diverse group of glycosides present in many families of plants. The primary effect of saponins in the rumen appears to be to inhibit the protozoa (defaunation), which might increase the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis and protein flow to the duodenum. Furthermore, saponins may decrease methane production via defaunation and/or directly by decreasing the activities (i.e. rate of methanogenesis or expression of methane-producing genes) and numbers of methanogens. Saponins may also selectively affect specific rumen bacteria and fungi, which may alter the rumen metabolism beneficially or adversely. The ammonia-adsorption and modulation of digesta passage in the rumen by saponins have also been implicated in altering rumen metabolism, but their physiological responses are likely to be negligible compared with microbiological effects. The effects of saponins on rumen fermentation have not been found to be consistent. These discrepancies appear to be related to the chemical structure and dosage of saponins, diet composition, microbial community and adaptation of microbiota to saponins. There is need for systematic research based on chemical structures of saponins, nutrient composition of diets and their effects on rumen microbial ecosystem to obtain consistent results. The present paper reviews and discusses the effects and mode of action of saponins on microbial community and fermentation in the rumen, and ruminant performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7 · Cited by 2,133
The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review
Francis, G., Kerem, Z., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (2002) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2002725 · Cited by 1,720
Factors That Alter Rumen Microbial Ecology
Russell, J. B., & Rychlik, J. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058830 · Cited by 946
Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom
Vincken, J.-P., Heng, L., de Groot, A., & Gruppen, H. (2007) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.10.008 · Cited by 796
Natural Food Antimicrobial Systems
(2000) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420039368 · Cited by 688
Williams, A. G., & Coleman, G. S. (1991) · Cited by 677
Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?
Russell, J. B., & Wilson, D. B. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76510-4 · Cited by 628
A review of plant-derived essential oils in ruminant nutrition and production
Benchaar, C., Calsamiglia, S., Chaves, A. V., Fraser, G. R., Colombatto, D., McAllister, T. A., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2008) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.014 · Cited by 615
Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human healt
Barton, M. D. (2000) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/095442200108729106 · Cited by 516
Antimicrobial properties of plant secondary metabolites
Wallace, R. J. (2004) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2004393 · Cited by 491
Cited by
A new perspective on the use of plant secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen
Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2010) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.05.010 · Cited by 579
Self-citationHuws, S. A., Creevey, C. J., Oyama, L. B., Mizrahi, I., Denman, S. E., Popova, M., Muñoz-Tamayo, R., Forano, E., Waters, S. M., Hess, M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161 · Cited by 487
Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances
Patra, A., Park, T., Kim, M., & Yu, Z. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-017-0145-9 · Cited by 466
Self-citationManipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites
Bodas, R., Prieto, N., García-González, R., Andrés, S., Giráldez, F. J., & López, S. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.07.010 · Cited by 437
Patra, A. K. (2012) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2090-y · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J.
- Venue
- Nutrition Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-219
- ISSN
- 0954-4224 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2700
- OpenAlex
- W2158835468
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0954422409990163
- The paper
- Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2009). The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production. Nutrition Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422409990163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.