The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Starch utilization by ruminants: from basics to the bunk.
Abstract
Starch is the major energy component of grains. Wheat contains 77% of DM as starch, corn and sorghum contain 72%, and barley and oats contain 57 to 58%. In vitro systems have provided valuable data on kinetic aspects of starch digestion. Molecular biological techniques have provided a clearer picture of the ruminal microbial milieu. Proportions of starch fermented in the rumen can be predicted satisfactorily for a variety of grains and processing methods. Compared with dry rolling, steam processing (flaking or rolling) increases ruminal digestibility of starch (percentage of intake) from 52 to 78% for sorghum, from 75 to 85% for corn, and six percentage units or less for other grains. Recent research provides new insight into pancreatic function and intestinal glucose transport systems. The capacity to digest starch in the intestine ranges from 45 to 85% of starch entering the duodenum, with that capacity apparently limited by the supply of pancreatic amylase. There is evidence that amylase secretion may be enhanced by increasing duodenal entry of protein. Capacity for active transport of glucose across of gut wall does not seem to limit the amount of starch digested that is absorbed as glucose. For ruminants eating medium- to high-concentrate diets, about 30% of their total glucose need comes from glucose absorption, 50% from organic acid absorption (substrates for hepatic gluconeogenesis), and 20% from other sources. When glucose absorption from the gut increases, ruminants generally adjust (decrease) gluconeogenesis to meet their need; that need is directly linked to DE intake. In terms of overall ME yield, grain starch is best used when it is fermented in the rumen. However, close coordination of protein and starch supply to the duodenum may improve capture of starch in the form of glucose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Diet on Short-Term Regulation of Feed Intake by Lactating Dairy Cattle
Allen, M. S. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75030-2 · Cited by 1,550
Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle
Firkins, J. L., Eastridge, M. L., St-Pierre, N. R., & Noftsger, S. M. (2001) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas2001.79e-supple218x · Cited by 267
González, L. A., Manteca, X., Calsamiglia, S., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., & Ferret, A. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009 · Cited by 256
Relationship between ruminal starch degradation and the physical characteristics of corn grain.
Philippeau, C., Le Deschault de Monredon, F., & Michalet-Doreau, B. (1999) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1999.771238x · Cited by 144
Effect of maize silage maturity on site of starch and NDF digestion in lactating dairy cows
Jensen, C., Weisbjerg, M. R., Nørgaard, P., & Hvelplund, T. (2005) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.10.011 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Huntington, G. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 852
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1536250937
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Starch utilization by ruminants: from basics to the bunk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1997.753852x
- The paper
- Huntington, G. B. (1997). Starch utilization by ruminants: from basics to the bunk. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.753852x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.