Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle

Firkins, J. L., Eastridge, M. L., St-Pierre, N. R., Noftsger, S. M.·2001·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Variation in site of digestion and lactation performance among lactating dairy cows fed different grain sources was evaluated and reviewed. The enzymatic assay for starch contributes to variation among and possibly even within experiments. Genetic differences within grain source affect digestibility, but effects of grain processing are considerable. When quantifying response criteria among numerous experiments with varying experimental procedures, the variation among experiments is very high and should be considered in regressions used to evaluate treatment responses. Some of the variation among experiments could be explained by variable DMI (positive relationship with milk production and microbial N flow to the duodenum but negative relationship with milk fat percentage and ruminal digestibility of starch) and other chemical measurements of dietary composition (especially forage and NDF percentages of the diet). Other sources of variation that could not be quantified among experiments were accounted for in regression models as experiment effects. After these adjustments, least squares means were calculated as the average of all effects remaining in the models. Our results documented that processing procedures to enhance the ruminal degradability of starch generally decreased NDF digestibility by a lesser degree, partially negating responses in true ruminal OMdigestibility. However, lactating cows fed diets with low ruminal degradability of starch had higher, nearly complete compensatory digestion of starch in the hindgut, thereby resulting in relatively minor improvements in total tractOMdigestibility or lactation performance for the more highly available starch sources, assuming similar DMI. These results highlight the importance of maximization of DMI compared with grainprocessing method and the need for more production experiments comparing grain sources at similar intakes of ruminally digestible starch (i.e., lower percentages in the diet for more highly degradable starch sources) for better evaluation of overall efficacy. In particular, the long-term responses and potential for residual responses over time (i.e., treatment × time interactions) are needed. Until better mechanistic prediction of lactation response is available, the least squares means of ruminal and total tract digestibilities of nutrients should be useful for empirical formulation and evaluation of dairy rations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/jas2001.79e-supple218x

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Firkins, J. L., Eastridge, M. L., St-Pierre, N. R., & Noftsger, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2001
Volume
79
Issue
E-Suppl
Pages
E218
ISSN
0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2531377461
Cited by
267
References
84
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas2001.79e-supple218x
The paper
Firkins, J. L., Eastridge, M. L., St-Pierre, N. R., & Noftsger, S. M. (2001). Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2001.79e-supple218x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.