The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predicting Forage Quality by Infrared Replectance Spectroscopy
Abstract
Near-infrared-reflectance spectra (1.4 to 2.4 µm) were recorded for 87 samples of ground dry forages. Temperate forage species analyzed were alfalfa, tall fescue and alfalfa bromegrass mixtures preserved as hay, silage and fresh frozen forages. Tropical species included bermudagrass and pangola digitgrass. Laboratory analysis of crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), lignin (L) and in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), as well as in vivo digestibility (DMD), dry matter intake (DMI) and digestible energy intake (DEI) were determined for these same samples. Reflectance (R) spectra were recorded as log (1/R) vs wavelength and transformed to the second derivative of log (1/R) vs wavelength for correlation with compositional and nutritional data. Multiple-linear-regression techniques were used to determine the optimum wavelengths for predicting each of the chemical in vitro and in vivo analyses. By use of up to nine wavelengths points for the prediction equations, the correlation coefficients were .99 for CP, .98 for NDF, .96 for ADF, .96 for L, .95 for IVDMD, .88 for DMD, .80 for DMI and .85 for digestible energy intake (DEI). Calibration equations generated from the odd-numbered samples predicted the values for the even-numbered samples within a standard error of ± .95% for CP, ± 3.1% for NDF, ± 5.1% for DMD and ± 7.9 g for DMI. We concluded that infrared reflectance has the potential for use in rapid evaluation of forage quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations
Lammers, B. P., Buckmaster, D. R., & Heinrichs, A. J. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76442-1 · Cited by 582
A Review on the Applications of Portable Near-Infrared Spectrometers in the Agro-Food Industry
dos Santos, C. A. T., Lopo, M., Páscoa, R. N. M. J., & Lopes, J. A. (2013) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1366/13-07228 · Cited by 320
Wang, P., & Yu, Z. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.04.001 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Norris, K. H., Barnes, R. F., Moore, J. E., & Shenk, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1976-10-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 889-897
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W38117118
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Forage Quality by Infrared Replectance Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas1976.434889x
- The paper
- Norris, K. H., Barnes, R. F., Moore, J. E., & Shenk, J. S. (1976). Predicting Forage Quality by Infrared Replectance Spectroscopy. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1976.434889x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.