Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficiency of Rumen Microbial Growth: Influence of some Theoretical and Experimental Factors on YATP

Hespell, Robert B., Bryant, Marvin P.·1979·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Based on known metabolic pathways involved in the biosynthesis of cell macromolecules, the amount of energy (ATP) required for the formation of microbial cells can be estimated. For a microbial rumen population of mixed species, the estimated YATP (grams dry weight cells formed per mole ATP expended) is 29 to 30 for growth on rich media containing preformed monomers and is 20 to 29 for growth on simple media containing carbohydrate and inorganic salts. The ranges in these values result from changes in the composition of the cells formed and not from changes in efficiencies of growth per se. Assuming equal amounts of growth in the rumen occur on rich and simple media conditions, the maximal theoretical YATP would be 26 and this might be lowered to 21, if large allowances are made for ATP expenditures for transport processes. Experimentally determined YATP values often are considerably lower than these theoretical values due to the influence of ATP expenditures for maintenance during growth and variations of YATP with growth rate. The data from nutrient-limited continuous culture (chemostat) studies of single or mixed species indicate rumen bacteria have the potential for a low growth maintenance requirement (Me) and high cell yields ( of 19 to 20). However, cell yields become progressively lower with decreasing growth rate, increasing Me, or both as a greater proportion of the ATP produced is diverted to maintenance functions. Me varies with both bacterial species and growth conditions and is composed of numerous components such as ATP expenditures or losses for motility, turnover, extracellular polymer formations, transport, or energetic uncoupling. A limitation of biosynthetic functions relative to ATP production by catabolism results in both increased energetic uncoupling and Me, but lower cell yields. This situation can occur readily with bacteria, particularly when biosynthesis is restricted by availability of N sources. Data on rumen NH3 levels and on NH3-affinity constants of rumen bacteria indicate that with many diets the prevailing rumen NH3 levels would seldom limit growth per se via energetic uncoupling. Concentrations of amino acids, oligopeptides, and (or) branched chain volatile fatty acids in the rumen 4 hr or more postfeeding often may be too low to permit good growth, resulting in higher Me via energetic uncoupling and in reduced cell yields. Overall, in vivo factors such as availability of the above nutrients are the major influences on bacterial cell yields as in vitro data indicate the rumen bacterial population as a whole has metabolic potential for efficient growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/jas1979.4961640x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Hespell, R. B., & Bryant, M. P.
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1979-12-01
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
1640-1659
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W1527023770
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency of Rumen Microbial Growth: Influence of some Theoretical and Experimental Factors on YATP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas1979.4961640x
The paper
Hespell, R. B., & Bryant, M. P. (1979). Efficiency of Rumen Microbial Growth: Influence of some Theoretical and Experimental Factors on YATP. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.4961640x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.