The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance
Abstract
Given that adoption of a new system often implies fully or partly replacing an incumbent system, resistance is often manifested as failure of a user to switch from an incumbent technology to a newly introduced one. Thus, a potential source of resistance to adopting a new system lies in the use of an incumbent system. Using the status quo bias and habit literatures as theoretical lenses, the study explains how use of an incumbent system negatively impacts new system perceptions and usage intentions. We argue that habitual use of an incumbent system, rationalization due to perceived transition costs, and psychological commitment due to perceived sunk costs all encourage development of inertia. Inertia in turn fully mediates the impact of these incumbent system constructs on constructs related to acceptance of the new system via psychological commitment based on cognitive consistency and by increasing the importance of normative pressures. Specifically, we hypothesize that inertia leads to decreased perceptions of the ease of use and relative advantage of a newly introduced system and has a negative impact on intentions to use the new system, above and beyond its impact through perceptions. Finally, we hypothesize that inertia moderates the relationship between subjective norm and intention, such that normative pressures to use a new system become more important in the presence of inertia. Empirical results largely support the hypothesized relationships showing the inhibiting effect of incumbent-system habit, transition and sunk costs, and inertia on acceptance of a new system. Our study thus extends theoretical understanding of the role of incumbent system constructs such as habit and inertia in technology acceptance, and lays the foundations for further study of the interplay between perceptions and cognition with respect to the incumbent system and those with respect to a new system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared with the decision to retain a premium subscription, the decision to upgrade represents a departure from the users' status quo”
From What drives subscribing to premium in freemium services? A consumer value‐based view of differences between upgrading to and staying with premium (2020) · cites this paper as Polites & Karahanna, 2012
In the citing paper
“While the intention to retain the premium subscription essentially means continuance of an existing behavior, the intention to upgrade from free to the premium subscription means a departure from the user's status quo (Kim & Kankanhalli, 2009;Polites & Karahanna, 2012).”
From What drives subscribing to premium in freemium services? A consumer value‐based view of differences between upgrading to and staying with premium (2020) · cites this paper as Polites & Karahanna, 2012
In the citing paper
“Moreover, inertia can be divided into two distinct measures: first, cognitive inertia and second, affective inertia (Greenfield 2005; Polites and Karahanna 2012).”
From Health insurance policy renewal: an exploration of reputation, performance, and affect to understand customer inertia (2022) · cites this paper as Polites and Karahanna 2012
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212 · Cited by 1,044
“It is identified in the literature that perceived risk contributes to the expectations of destructive consequences, thus, imparting a negative effect on usage intention [35,67,68].”
BackgroundMaier, C., Laumer, S., Weinert, C., & Weitzel, T. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12068 · Cited by 681
“The multidimensional stress creator constructs were conceptualized as superordinate constructs (reflective first-order and reflective second-order construct; Polites et al., 2012) and evaluated as suggested by Wright et al. (2012).”
InfluentialBesson, P., & Rowe, F. (2012) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001 · Cited by 591
“…2000; Hackbarth et al., 2003); Performance vs. Learning goal orientation (Yi and Hwang, 2003); Status quo bias (Kim and Kankanhalli, 2009); Polites and Karahanna, 2012) Socio-cognitive inertia Norms and values at the individual, group, organization, industry and society levels Agents are…”
BackgroundConsumer Resistance to Innovation in Services: Challenges and Barriers in the Internet of Things Era
Mani, Z., & Chouk, I. (2018) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12463 · Cited by 444
Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.008 · Cited by 443
“Using this method construct allows us not only comparing the loadings of each item on its own factor and the method factor, but also calculating the amount of method bias present in the entire dataset (Podsakoff et al., 2003; Polites and Karahanna, 2012).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E.
- Affiliations
- Bucknell University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2012-03-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-42
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W4401611614
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Keywords
- technology adoption, status quo bias, habit, inertia, switching costs, sunk costs, resistance to change, technology acceptance, perceived ease of use, relative advantage, intention to use, subjective norms, normative pressure, cognitive consistency, psychological commitment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review