The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural Differences and Geography as Determinants of Online Prosocial Lending1
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze patterns of transaction between individuals using data drawn from Kiva.org, a global online crowdfunding platform that facilitates prosocial, peer-to-peer lending. Our analysis, which employs an aggregate dataset of country-to-country lending volumes based on more than three million individual lending transactions that took place between 2005 and 2010, considers the dual roles of geographic distance and cultural differences on lenders’ decisions about which borrowers to support. While cultural differences have seen extensive study in the Information Systems literature as sources of friction in extended interactions, here, we argue and demonstrate their role in individuals’ selection of a transaction partner. We present evidence that lenders do prefer culturally similar and geographically proximate borrowers. An analysis of the marginal effects indicates that an increase of one standard deviation in the cultural differences between lender and borrower countries is associated with 30 fewer lending actions, while an increase of one standard deviation in physical distance is associated with 0.23 fewer lending actions. We also identify a substitution effect between cultural differences and physical distance, such that a 50 percent increase in physical distance is associated with an approximate 30 percent decline in the effect of cultural differences. Considering approaches to overcoming the observed cultural effect, we offer some empirical evidence of the potential of IT-based trust mechanisms, focusing on Kiva’s reputation rating system for microfinance intermediaries. We discuss the implications of our findings for prosocial lending, online crowdfunding, and electronic markets more broadly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051042177649 · Cited by 2,524
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0015 · Cited by 2,516
Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes *
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441 · Cited by 2,436 · cited 3×
“In the end, we opt to employ this second, aggregate approach, because, as noted, this is the approach that the bulk of the prior literature dealing with globalized interpersonal trade has employed, both in offline (Anderson and Wincoop 2004; Guiso et al. 2009; Helpman et al. 2008; Silva and Tenreyro 2006) and”
BackgroundMethodHaving less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior.
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020092 · Cited by 1,478
Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study
Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(97)00026-8 · Cited by 1,246
Chen, M. K. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.2.690 · Cited by 745
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0065 · Cited by 580
Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing
Krishna, S., Sahay, S., & Walsham, G. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/975817.975818 · Cited by 542
Examining the Impact of Ranking on Consumer Behavior and Search Engine Revenue
Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P. G., & Li, B. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1828 · Cited by 299
Self-citationReinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.06 · Cited by 243
Cited by
Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity
Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916 · Cited by 785
Self-citationResolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success
Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12267 · Cited by 760
Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms
Stallkamp, M., & Schotter, A. P. J. (2021) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1336 · Cited by 420
Does equity crowdfunding democratize entrepreneurial finance?
Cumming, D., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2021) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00188-z · Cited by 268
Crowdfunding and the Democratization of Access to Capital—An Illusion? Evidence from Housing Prices
Kim, K., & Hann, I.-H. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0802 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2014-09-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 773-794
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W3125005799
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 59.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural Differences and Geography as Determinants of Online Prosocial Lending1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.07
- The paper
- Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2014). Cultural Differences and Geography as Determinants of Online Prosocial Lending1. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.