The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Connecting the Parts with the Whole: Toward an Information Ecology Theory of Digital Innovation Ecosystems
Abstract
The remarkable connectivity and embeddedness of digital technologies enable innovations undertaken by a broad set of actors, often beyond organizational and industry boundaries, whose relationships mimic those of interdependent species in a natural ecosystem. These digital innovation ecosystems, if successful, can spawn countless innovations of substantial social and economic value, but are complex and prone to often surprising failure. Aiming to understand ecosystems as a new organizational form for digital innovations, I develop a theory that addresses an underexplored but important question: In a digital innovation ecosystem, how are the efforts of autonomous parties integrated into a coherent whole and what role do digital technologies play in this integration? By synthesizing ecological and information perspectives, this information ecology theory identifies several key functions that digital technologies serve in providing the information needed to support the interactions and tasks for innovation in ecosystems of varying scales. This theory contributes to digital innovation research new insights on managing part–whole relations, the role of digital technologies in innovation, and multilevel interactions in and across digital innovation ecosystems. The theory can also inspire the development of next-generation information systems for ecosystems as a new organizational form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Central Problems in the Management of Innovation
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590 · Cited by 3,746
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 · Cited by 3,504
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306
Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03 · Cited by 2,967
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm
Ulrich, K. (1995) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3 · Cited by 2,885
Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
Adner, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316678451 · Cited by 2,600
Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257550 · Cited by 2,561
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, P.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2021-03-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 397-422
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W3138663867
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 33.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Connecting the Parts with the Whole: Toward an Information Ecology Theory of Digital Innovation Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.25300/misq/2021/15864
- The paper
- Wang, P. (2021). Connecting the Parts with the Whole: Toward an Information Ecology Theory of Digital Innovation Ecosystems. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2021/15864
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.