Cited by 19Physical Activity and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

How sedentary are Canadian adults? It depends on the measure

Open access
Statistics Canada·2022·Government of Canada

Abstract

Canadian adults spend a large proportion of their day engaged in sedentary behaviour, which in excess, is a risk factor for hypertension, obesity, depression, chronic conditions and premature mortality. Using data from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) and the new Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and 65 years and older, the purpose of this study is to compare the percentages of Canadians meeting three different sedentary thresholds (less than and equal to 3 hours per day of screen time, less than and equal to 7 per day of self-reported sitting time and less than and equal to 9 hours per day of accelerometer-measured sedentary time).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.25318/82-003-x202201000002-eng

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining questionnaires and device-based measures may support public health efforts to further quantify the dose-response of PA and sedentary behaviors for health outcomes, potentially leading to new device-based guidelines for PA and health and guidance for reducing sedentary time throughout the day.

    “Combining questionnaires and device-based measures33 may support public health efforts to further quantify the dose-response of PA and sedentary behaviors for health outcomes, potentially leading to new device-based guidelines for PA and health and guidance for reducing sedentary time throughout the day.14,37”

    From 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A third update of the energy costs of human activities (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canada, S.
Affiliations
Statistics Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Statistics Canada
Venue
Government of Canada
Publisher
Government of Canada
Published
2022
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
14-27
OpenAlex
W4307492650
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Statistics Canada Dissemination
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
sedentary behavior, sitting time, screen time, self-reported sedentary time, accelerometer-measured sedentary time, Canadian adults, 24-hour movement guidelines, physical activity guidelines adherence, Canadian Health Measures Survey
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adult, Canada, Humans, Sedentary Behavior, Self Report, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review