The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Proton Sponge: a Trick to Enter Cells the Viruses Did Not Exploit
Open accessAbstract
Several non-permanent polycations possessing substantial buffering capacity below physiological pH, such as lipopolyamines and polyethylenimines, are efficient transfection agents per se, i.e. without the addition of lysosomotropic bases, or cell targeting, or membrane disruption agents. These vectors have been shown to deliver genes as well as oligonucleotides both in vitro and in vivo. Our hypothesis is that their efficiency relies on extensive endosome swelling and rupture that provides an escape mechanism for the polycation/DNA particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Briefly, 2° and 3° amines on polymer chains can be protonated inside endo-lysosomes and then counterbalance chloride ions flow into the vesicles. This process creates an osmotic gradient between the exterior and interior of the endo-lysosomes, leading to swelling and bursting of these vesicles and releasing the polyplex into the cytosol [178].”
From Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [178]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
None of the references could be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- R.G. Crystal, Science 1995, 270, 404.
- B.N. Fields, D.M. Knipe, 'Virology' ,Raven Press, New York, 1990.
- -P. Behr, Bioconjugate Chem. 1994,5, 382.
- M. Cotten, E. Wagner, Curro Opinion Bio- tech 1993,4, 705.
- F. Labat-Moleur, A.M. Steffan, C. Brisson, H. Perron, O. Feugeas, P.Furstenberger, F. Oberling, E. Brambilla, 1.-P. Behr, Gene Ther. 1996,3,1010.
- P. Hawley-Nelson, V. Ciccarone, G. Ge- beyehu, 1.lessee, P.L. Feigner, Focus 1993, 15,73.
- S. Remy, C. Sirlin, P. Vierling, 1.-P. Behr, Bioconjugate Chem. 1994,5,647.
- U.S.A. 1995,92, 1744.
- H. Veelken, H. Jesuiter, A. Mackensen, P. Kulmburg, 1. Schultze, F. Rosenthal, R. Mertelsmann, A. Lindemann, Human Gene Ther. 1994,5, 1203.
- Haensler, F.C. Szoka, Bioconjugate Chem. 1993, 4, 372.
- O. Boussif, F. Lezoualc'h, M.A. Zanta, M.D. Mergny, D. Scherman,B. Demeneix, 1.-P. Behr, Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995,92,7297.
- O. Boussif, M.A. Zanta, J.-P. Behr, Gene Ther. 1996, 3, 1074.
- N. Nelson, Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1991, 12,71.
- E. Kofukuta, M. Hirata, S. Iwai, Kobunshi Ronbunshu (Engl.) 1974, 3, 1383.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chitosan Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Perspectives
Kumar, M. N. V. R., Müzzarelli, R. A. A., Muzzarelli, C., Sashiwa, H., & Domb, A. J. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030441b · Cited by 2,945
Design and development of polymers for gene delivery
Pack, D. W., Hoffman, A. S., Pun, S., & Stayton, P. S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1775 · Cited by 2,568
Nonviral vectors for gene delivery
Mintzer, M. A., & Simanek, E. E. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800409e · Cited by 2,366
Fischer, D., Li, Y., Ahlemeyer, B., Krieglstein, J., & Kissel, T. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00445-3 · Cited by 2,329
Nanocarriers’ entry into the cell: relevance to drug delivery
Hillaireau, H., & Couvreur, P. (2009) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0053-z · Cited by 1,620
“increasing repulsion of the protonated groups [112].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Behr, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Behr, Jean-Paul
- Venue
- CHIMIA
- Publisher
- Swiss Chemical Society
- Published
- 1997-02-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 34
- ISSN
- 0009-4293 (ISSN-L)
- 2673-2424
- OpenAlex
- W4292328694
- Cited by
- 933
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
- Keywords
- proton sponge, polyethyleneimine, endosomal escape, gene delivery, oligonucleotide delivery, buffering capacity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review