The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Silico Modeling and Scoring of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Poses
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02155 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional molecules that induce ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of proteins via formation of ternary complexes between an E3 ubiquitin ligase and a target protein. Rational design of PROTACs requires accurate knowledge of the native configuration of the PROTAC induced ternary complex. This study demonstrates that native and non-native ternary complex poses can be distinguished based on pose occupancy time in MD, where native poses exhibit longer occupancy times than non-native ones at both room and higher temperatures. Candidate poses are generated by MD sampling and pre-ranked by the classic MM/GBSA method. A specific heating scheme is then applied to induce ternary pose departure, generating an occupancy score and temperature score reflecting pose occupancy time and fraction. The scoring approach enables identification of the native pose in all the test systems. Beyond providing a relative rank of hypothetical poses of a given ternary system, the method could also provide empirical guidance to whether a given ternary pose is likely a native one or not. The success of the method is in part attributed to the dynamic nature of the pose departure analysis which accounts for solute entropic effects, typically neglected in the faster static pose scoring methods, while solute entropic contributions play a greater role in protein-protein interactions than in protein-ligand systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Liao, J., Nie, X., Unarta, I., Ericksen, S., & Tang, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ericksen, Spencer
- Tang, Weiping
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-12-20
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 6116-6132
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13242788
- OpenAlex
- W4226101063
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH Office of the Director (NIH P41- GM103311)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- PROTACs, ternary complex, E3 ubiquitin ligase, protein degradation, molecular dynamics, entropic effects, protein-protein interaction, PROTAC design
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review