PreprintCited by 100Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliverySurfactants and Colloidal SystemsAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

Think Beyond the Core: The Impact of the Hydrophilic Corona on the Drug Solubilization Using Polymer Micelles

Open access
Haider, Malik Salman, Lübtow, Michael M, Endres, Sebastian, Aseyev, Vladimir, Pöppler, Ann-Christin, Luxenhofer, Robert·2019·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acsami.9b22495 · Paper page

Abstract

Polymeric micelles are typically characterized as core-shell structures. The hydrophobic inner core is considered as depot for hydrophobic molecules such as drugs or catalysts and the corona forming block acts as protective, stabilizing and solubilizing interface between the hydrophobic core and the external aqueous milieu. Tremendous efforts have been made to tune the hydrophobic block to increase the drug loading and stability of the micelles, while the role of hydrophilic blocks regarding drug loading and stability of micelles is rarely studied in detail. To do so, we investigated a small library of structurally similar A-B-A type amphiphiles based on poly(2-oxazoline)s and poly(2-oxazine)s by varying the hydrophilic block A utilizing poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) (A) or poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (A*), both excellently water-soluble polymers that are able to provide beneficial stealth properties. Surprisingly, major differences in loading capacities from A-B-A > A*-B-A > A*-B-A* highlight the impact of the hydrophilic corona of the polymer micelles on drug loading and stability. 1H-NMR spectroscopy revealed that the hydrophilic pEtOx exhibits a stronger interaction with the cargo compared with its more hydrophilic counterpart pMeOx, reducing colloidal stability of the drug loaded micelles at lower drug loading. To gain more insights, formulations were also characterized by diffusion ordered and nuclear Overhauser effect NMR spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering and (micro) differential scanning calorimetry. Our findings suggest that the interaction between the hydrophilic block and the guest molecule should be considered an important but previously largely ignored factor for the rational design of polymeric micelles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv.9710579.v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As curcumin loading increased, SANS data suggest that curcumin initially located in the micelle core shifted to the periphery, forming an inner shell within the micelles.

    “As the drug loading amount increased, the SANS data suggests that curcumin initially located in the micelle core shifted to the periphery forming an inner “shell” within the micelles.”

    From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction (page not available) reports that, at higher loading, curcumin began to reside in the micelle’s shell-forming block. It does not identify SANS as the evidence or describe curcumin shifting from the core to form an inner shell. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 1H-NMR revealed that PEtOx had a much greater propensity than PMeOx for interacting with curcumin at lower loadings.

    “1H-NMR spectroscopy revealed that the latter displayed much greater propensity for interacting with the drug at the lower loadings, which is possibly reducing the colloidal stability of the drug loaded micelles by shrinking the shell.”

    From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [46]

    In the formulations discussion (page unavailable), the authors interpret their ¹H-NMR findings as indicating stronger interaction of pEtOx than pMeOx with curcumin. But their proposed micelle model says there is no major difference at no or very low drug loading; the stronger interaction emerges as loading increases. The claim’s qualification that the greater propensity occurs at lower loadings is therefore not supported as stated. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The greater propensity of PEtOx to interact with curcumin at lower loadings possibly reduces colloidal stability of drug-loaded micelles by shrinking the shell.

    “1H-NMR spectroscopy revealed that the latter displayed much greater propensity for interacting with the drug at the lower loadings, which is possibly reducing the colloidal stability of the drug loaded micelles by shrinking the shell.”

    From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [46]

    The ¹H-NMR discussion reports that pEtOx loses mobility even at low curcumin loading and interacts more strongly with curcumin than pMeOx as loading increases. The paper links pEtOx-corona dehydration to agglomeration, but does not establish shell shrinkage or reduced colloidal stability at the lower loading: its DLS section reports no significant micelle-size differences at 2 g/L curcumin. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In SANS analysis of curcumin-loaded POx/POzi micelles, curcumin showed differential localization depending on its loading amount.

    “Consistent with the NMR study discussed in the previous section, this drug revealed differential localization depending on its loading amount in the micelles.”

    From Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval. (2020) · cites this paper as [46]

    In the section on pPrOzi micelle formulations (page unavailable), the paper proposes a tentative loading-dependent model: as curcumin loading increases, the pEtOx corona interacts more strongly with the drug. That supports a loading-dependent change in the micelles, but the paper does not report SANS analysis or establish curcumin’s differential localization by that method; its relevant measurements include NMR. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Drug interactions with the hydrophilic block play a significant role in achieving extremely high drug loadings.

    “This study suggests a significant role for drug interactions with the hydrophilic block in achieving extremely-high drug loadings.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. P.L. Turecek, M.J. Bossard, F. Schoetens, I.A. Ivens, PEGylation of biopharmaceuticals: a review of chemistry and nonclinical safety information of approved drugs, J. Pharm. Sci. 105(2) (2016) 460-475.
  2. P. Ma, R.J. Mumper, Paclitaxel nano-delivery systems: a comprehensive review, J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 4(2) (2013) 1000164.
  3. O. Naksuriya, S. Okonogi, R.M. Schiffelers, W.E. Hennink, Curcumin nanoformulations: a review of pharmaceutical properties and preclinical studies and clinical data related to cancer treatment, Biomaterials 35(10) (2014) 3365-3383.
  4. M.M. Lübtow, H. Marciniak, A. Schmiedel, M. Roos, C. Lambert, R. Luxenhofer, Ultra-high to ultra-low drug loaded micelles: Probing host-guest interactions by fluorescence spectroscopy, Chem. Eur. J. (2019) in print, DOI: 10.1002/chem.201902619. · DOI · Paper page
  5. A.-C. Pöppler, M.M. Lübtow, J. Schlauersbach, J. Wiest, L. Meinel, R. Luxenhofer, Loading dependent Structural Model of Polymeric Micelles by Solid-State NMR, ChemRxiv (2019) DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.8943251.v1. · DOI
  6. A. Maksimenko, F. Dosio, J. Mougin, A. Ferrero, S. Wack, L.H. Reddy, A.-A. Weyn, E. Lepeltier, C. Bourgaux, B. Stella, A unique squalenoylated and nonpegylated doxorubicin nanomedicine with systemic long-circulating properties and anticancer activity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 111(2) (2014) E217-E226.
  7. Witte, H., & Seeliger, W. (1974). Cyclische imidsäureester aus nitrilen und aminoalkoholen. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 1974(6), 996-1009.
  8. Lübtow, M. M., Hahn, L., Haider, M. S., & Luxenhofer, R. (2017). Drug specificity, synergy and antagonism in ultrahigh capacity poly (2-oxazoline)/poly (2-oxazine) based formulations. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 139(32), 10980-10983.
  9. Lübtow, M. M., Keßler, L., Appelt-Menzel, A., Lorson, T., Gangloff, N., Kirsch, & Luxenhofer, R. (2018). More Is Sometimes Less: Curcumin and Paclitaxel Formulations Using Poly (2- oxazoline) and Poly (2-oxazine)-Based Amphiphiles Bearing Linear and Branched C9 Side Chains. Macromolecular bioscience, 18(11), 1800155.
  10. Hu, L., Shi, Y., Li, J. H., Gao, N., Ji, J., Niu, F. & Wang, S. (2015). Enhancement of oral bioavailability of curcumin by a novel solid dispersion system. Aaps Pharmscitech, 16(6), 1327-1334.
  11. Lübtow, M. M., Nelke, L. C., Seifert, J., Kühnemundt, J., Sahay, G., Dandekar, & Luxenhofer, R. (2019). Drug induced micellization into ultra-high capacity and stable curcumin nanoformulations: Physico-chemical characterization and evaluation in 2D and 3D in vitro models. Journal of Controlled Release, 303, 162-180.
  12. Liggins, R. T., Hunter, W. L., & Burt, H. M. (1997). Solid-state characterization of paclitaxel. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 86(12), 1458-1463.
  13. Guo, X., Laryea, E., Wilhelm, M., Luy, B., Nirschl, H., & Guthausen, G. (2017). Diffusion in Polymer Solutions: Molecular Weight Distribution by PFG-NMR and Relation to SEC. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 218(1), 1600440.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haider, M. S., Lübtow, M. M., Endres, S., Aseyev, V., Pöppler, A.-C., & Luxenhofer, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Luxenhofer, Robert
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2019-08-23
Volume
12
Issue
22
Pages
24531-24543
ISSN
1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021349866
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Verband der Chemischen Industrie
  • Evonik Stiftung
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (398461692)
  • Higher Education Commission, Pakistan
  • Higher Education Commision, Pakistan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Keywords
polymeric micelles, drug solubilization, amphiphilic block copolymers, poly(2-oxazoline), poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline), drug loading capacity, curcumin, paclitaxel, core-shell micelles, micelle stability, drug-micelle interaction
MeSH terms
Curcumin, Drug Carriers, Drug Compounding, Micelles, Oxazoles, Polymers, Solubility, Surface-Active Agents, Molecular Structure, Paclitaxel, Small Molecule Libraries, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review