Cited by 31Hip disorders and treatmentsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

A Conversation with an Open Artificial Intelligence Platform on Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Treatment

Open access
Seth, Ishith, Rodwell, Aaron, Tso, Reece, Valles, John, Bulloch, Gabriella, Seth, Nimish·2023·Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26502/josm.511500088

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ChatGPT's response on total hip arthroplasty neglects to address potential risks and complications such as damage to nearby organs or anesthesia-related concerns.

    “For instance, total hip arthroplasty neglects to address potential risks and complications associated with the surgery, such as damage to nearby organs or anesthesia-related concerns.”
  • ChatGPT lacks the expert opinions necessary for in-depth orthopedic research, limiting its impact on orthopedic surgeons.

    “Nonetheless, it lacks the expert opinions necessary for in-depth orthopedic research, limiting its impact on orthopedic surgeons.17)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aljanabi M, Ghazi M, Ali AH, et al. ChatGpt: Open Possibilities. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics 4 (2023): 62-64.
  2. O'Connor S. Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Education in Practice 66 (2022): 103537-103537.
  3. Kim J-h. Search for Medical Information and Treatment Options for Musculoskeletal Disorders through an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot: Focusing on Shoulder Impingement Syndrome. medRxiv (2022).
  4. Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature 613 (2023): 423.
  5. Healy WL, Iorio R, Clair AJ, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: standardized list, definitions, and stratification developed by the hip society. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 474 (2016): 357-364.
  6. Fagotti L, Falotico GG, Maranho DA, et al. Posterior versus anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Ortop Bras 29 (2021): 297-303.
  7. Lewis S, Glen J, Dawoud D, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis strategies for people undergoing elective total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Value in Health 22 (2019): 953-969.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seth, I., Rodwell, A., Tso, R., Valles, J., Bulloch, G., & Seth, N.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
Published
2023
Volume
05
Issue
01
ISSN
2688-5115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4327650176
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
hip osteoarthritis, osteoarthritis treatment, artificial intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review